MSc Management
Project Management Essentials
THE SMART CITY OS CASE STUDY
The objective of the Smart City Operating System (OS) project in Hull is to turn Hull into a "programmable city," putting it in the lead in the competition to become the first smart city in the United Kingdom. The Hull City Council, the technology firm Connexin, and Cisco are working together on this project as part of a collaborative effort. Its goal is to improve data exchange and decision-making across a wide range of municipal services, including those dealing with traffic management, health care, and social services.
This study offers an in-depth review of the project management techniques that are necessary to guarantee the effective execution of Hull's Smart City OS project. It focuses on important aspects of project management, such as project management skills, management of stakeholders and other stakeholders, parameters for the project triangle, management of resources, risk reduction, and management of teams. This paper makes use of the insights gained from the case study of Hull's project, which are supplemented by examples taken from other initiatives of a similar kind that have taken place in the real world. The report is organised in such a way as to give observations and suggestions that would contribute to the business continuity and resilience of the project, so guaranteeing that Hull will make a smooth transition into the role of a Smart City.
The project manager for the Hull Smart City OS project should possess a set of essential talents in order to properly manage the project's intricate workings and steer it in the direction of accomplishment (Al Amri et al., 2021).
2.1.1 Required skills for the Project Manager
Technical Knowledge | The technological complexities of the project need a deep familiarity with smart city technology, data analytics, and the Internet of Things. |
Leadership | Maintaining momentum on a project requires an effective leader who can inspire and direct his or her team members as well as any other interested parties (Brière et al., 2015). |
Risk Management | The key to successfully overcoming unforeseen obstacles in a project is anticipating possible risks and creating plans to deal with them. |
Negotiation | Negotiation skills are essential for striking a balance between competing interests (Cripe, and Burleigh, 2022). |
Change Management | The ever-evolving nature of smart city initiatives necessitates a flexible approach to change management. |
2.1.2 Development plans for these skills
1) Technical Knowledge: This talent may be honed by participation in continuing education programmes, attendance at useful webinars, and familiarity with the most recent technological developments. Singapore's Smart City project is a shining illustration of how technological expertise may be put to good use by project managers.
2) Leadership: Leadership training programmes and one on one coaching may help develop such qualities (Araújo, and Pedron, 2016). Managers in Barcelona's smart city effort, for instance, showed exceptional leadership to steer the project to a positive outcome.
3) Risk Management: Risk management expertise may be honed via the pursuit of a certification in the field and by the ongoing study of project case studies. One example of a project where risk management played an important part in its successful completion is the Copenhagen smart city project (Mateo et al., 2017).
4) Negotiation: Attending negotiating classes might help hone your abilities in this area. A fundamental issue for project managers working on Amsterdam's smart city effort was striking a balance between competing interests of various stakeholders (DuBois et al., 2015).
5) Change Management: Taking a course in change management might help you become more adept at it (Maqbool et al., 2017). South Korea's Songdo smart city project is a good example of how effective change management may improve results.
The success percentage of the Hull Smart City OS project may be greatly increased if the project manager has these abilities.
2.2 Stakeholder Management and Engagement
2.2.1 Identification of stakeholders
Hull City Council, Connexin, Cisco, local companies, inhabitants of Hull, students and faculty at the University of Hull, and the Humberside Fire and Rescue Service are the major stakeholders in the Hull Smart City OS project. Potential digital firms, regional transit and healthcare providers, and data privacy and security regulators are examples of secondary stakeholders (Bourne, 2016).
2.2.2 Creation of Stakeholder Influence Map
The strength and motivations of each stakeholder may be gauged with the use of an influence map. Hull City Council, for example, has significant influence and stake in this endeavour because of its governing function (García-Nieto et al., 2015). Hull locals share this pattern of strong attention and limited influence. Companies in the technology industry, such as Connexin and Cisco, have a lot of influence but limited interest since they are working on several projects at once. Hull University and Humberside Fire and Rescue Service are influential and important institutions in Hull to a lesser extent (Aragonés-Beltrán et al., 2017). Low-power, high-interest groups include local companies and prospective tech firms, whereas high-power, low-interest groups include regulatory agencies.
2.2.3 Engagement Strategies for stakeholders
Figure 1 Stakeholder influence map
Source: (Elsawah et al., 2015)
· High power, high interest stakeholders: These parties need to be kept in the loop consistently, have a voice in important decisions, and be consulted extensively.
· High power, low interest stakeholders: Maintain their trust by keeping them well-informed, particularly in areas of compliance and regulation.
· Low power, high interest stakeholders: They need to be kept in the loop about the project's progress, and their input should be valued. Their energy has the potential to yield new developments.
· Low power, low interest stakeholders: Even while it's not necessary to go above and beyond in order to meet their demands, you shouldn't ignore them either.
The city council of Barcelona successfully partnered with IT firms, residents, and local businesses on the Barcelona Smart City project, demonstrating the importance of strategic stakeholder engagement (Aaltonen et al., 2015). Hull's Smart City OS project may benefit from adopting a similar strategy.
2.3.1 Importance of Project Triangle Parameters
Cost, time, and scope make up the project triangle, often known as the triple constraint. Time is essential for the project to be completed on schedule, but cost is crucial for staying within the budget. The project's scope describes its intended outcomes (Pollack et al., 2018). This is very necessary if we are to fulfil the needs of our stakeholders.
Figure 2 The project triangle
Source: (Bronte-Stewart, 2015)
2.3.2 Inter-relation between Triangle Parameters
A change in one of these factors might have knock-on effects on the others due to their interdependence. For instance, if you want to expand the project's scope, it might end up costing you more time and money, while if you want to shorten the timeline, it could end up costing you more money and resources.
2.3.3 Impact of Possible Changes
Changes in technology, stakeholder expectations, and government regulations are all factors that the Hull Smart City OS project should account for. The project's triad may be affected by these. A new technology advance, for instance, may expand the project's scope but also raise its cost and timeline.
The Copenhagen Connecting project is a shining example of successful management of the project triangle since it achieved its goals within its allotted time and cost constraints while exceeding the expectations of its stakeholders (Gemünden, 2015). The Hull Smart City OS project may learn how to manage their project triangle more effectively by looking at other similar projects.
Figure 3 Copenhagen Connecting project
Source: (Gemünden, 2015)
3.1.1 Required Resources for the Project
Hull Smart City OS requires many resources due of its scope. Human resources include project managers, programmers, data analysts, security analysts, and IT infrastructure workers. Domain experts in traffic management, trash management, environmental monitoring, and urban planning can give the contextual and technical knowledge needed (Kliem, and Ludin, 2019).
Human resources, equipment, and software are required. This project requires citywide sensors that input operating system data. These sensors may range from simple thermometers and light metres to GPS trackers and air quality analyzers. Data collection requires IoT devices. Servers for data storage and processing—on-premises or in the cloud—are another hardware need.
Figure 4 Resources pyramid
Source: (Simchi-Levi et al., 2015)
The OS, numerous system integration tools, data processing and analytics software, artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, and cybersecurity solutions are all examples of necessary software. It will also be necessary to provide user-interactive apps for the smart city operating system, whether those users are municipal administrators or ordinary residents.
3.1.2 Cost Estimation Techniques
Cost estimation for a project with as many moving parts as Hull Smart City OS might be difficult to do. Several methods are available. When there is a lot of unknown about the size and scope of a project, a probabilistic cost estimate like the one provided by the Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) might be helpful (Heagney, 2016). Bottom-Up Estimation, on the other hand, provides a more precise cost estimate by subdividing the project into smaller, more manageable jobs and evaluating the cost of each work separately.
3.1.3 Importance of Baselining Activities and Determining a Critical Path
The project's scope, timing, and budget may be baselined to compare progress reports. It detects plan deviations immediately so corrective action may be performed. The Hull Smart City OS project needs a detailed baseline for scope, duration, and cost.
Project planning requires determining the "critical path," the longest succession of tasks that must be completed on time to prevent delays (Wideman, 2022). It helps prioritise work, manage resources wisely, and predict project outcomes.
Figure 5 Baselining Activities
Source: (Ford, and Lyneis, 2020)
3.1.4 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Cost Estimation
Top-down cost estimation is faster since it uses project-wide data. It may be unreliable since it ignores task-specific factors. The bottom-up strategy demands cost estimates for each action before adding them together. This laborious procedure provides a detailed cost analysis.
Top-down or bottom-up method depends on project progress and available information. A bottom-up method may function better during the Hull Smart City OS project's execution phase, when task-level details are available, than a top-down one during its planning and preparation stages (Hopkin, 2018).
Figure 6 Smart Dubai project
Source: (Falkner, and Hiebl, 2015)
The Smart Dubai project provides a good case study for the use of a middle ground between top-down and bottom-up estimates in the management of smart city project costs. A rough estimate was obtained using the top-down method at the outset; this estimate was then fine-tuned using the bottom-up method when additional information became available. The Hull Smart City Operating System project might use this method as a useful example.
3.2 Risk Management within the Project
3.2.1 Risk Analysis and Register Creation
The Hull Smart City OS's numerous moving pieces and new technology threats have delayed the project. Risk assessments begin with threat identification. This project might face technological obstacles like software bugs or hardware failures, financial concerns like cost overruns, and human issues like a shortage of personnel or low user adoption.
Risks are ranked by severity and likelihood. Impact and likelihood provide a risk score that may rate dangers. If a danger has a high impact and chance, it will be more important.
A risk register tracks risks, ratings, and countermeasures (Ford, and Lyneis, 2020). A project's risk register tracks and mitigates dangers. It adapts to new dangers and diminishes others.
Risk ID | Risk Description | Risk Category | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Level | Mitigating Actions |
R1 | Cybersecurity breaches | Operational | High | High | High | Implement robust cybersecurity measures, conduct regular vulnerability assessments and penetration testing, and educate employees on best practices for data security. |
R2 | Regulatory changes | Compliance | Medium | Medium | Medium | Stay updated on relevant regulations, establish a compliance team, conduct regular audits, and maintain open communication with regulatory authorities. |
R3 | Funding constraints | Financial | High | High | High | Diversify funding sources, explore partnerships, seek grants and sponsorships, and regularly review and adjust the project budget. |
R4 | Technological failures | Operational | Medium | High | High | Perform thorough testing and quality assurance, establish backup systems, conduct regular maintenance and updates, and have a contingency plan in place for system failures. |
R5 | Stakeholder resistance | Strategic | Medium | Medium | Medium | Conduct stakeholder analysis, maintain open communication, address concerns and feedback, and involve stakeholders in decision-making processes. |
R6 | Data privacy breaches | Compliance | Medium | High | High | Implement stringent data protection measures, comply with relevant privacy laws and regulations, conduct regular audits, and provide training on data handling and privacy protocols. |
(i) Data breaches, system disruptions, and tarnished reputations are just some of the possible outcomes of a cybersecurity breach, making this a high-priority operational risk for the project.
(ii) Compliance with existing regulations may be affected by new regulations, which may need modifications to the project's methods, data management, and legal requirements.
(iii) The allocation of resources, the procurement of new technologies, and the full execution of the project might all be hampered by a lack of funds.
(iv) There is a risk that the success of the project may be hampered by technological failures such as system crashes or software bugs.
(v) Concerns about the project's effect, a lack of knowledge, or aversion to change may all lead to resistance from stakeholders, which can slow down or halt cooperation and development (Glendon et al., 2016).
(vi) Data privacy breaches may have serious repercussions for a company's bottom line and public image, thus strict precautions must be taken to safeguard sensitive data and ensure adherence to privacy laws.
Measures to Reduce Impact:
· Reduce the likelihood of cyber-attacks by instituting stringent cybersecurity precautions including doing frequent vulnerability assessments and penetration testing and educating staff on best practises for protecting sensitive information.
· Prepare for the possibility of new rules by keeping abreast of developments in the field, assembling a compliance team, doing frequent audits, and keeping lines of communication open with regulatory authorities (Heagney, 2016).
· To lessen the impact of any financing shortages, it is important to evaluate and revise the project budget often, to pursue several funding avenues, and to seek for grants and sponsors.
· To reduce the chances of technology failure, it is important to do exhaustive testing and quality assurance, create backup systems, perform routine maintenance and upgrades, and have a backup plan in place (Ho et al., 2015).
· To lessen stakeholder opposition, it's important to do stakeholder analysis, keep lines of communication open, listen to and respond to input, and include stakeholders into decision-making.
· The danger of data privacy breaches may be reduced by the use of strict data protection measures, the observance of applicable privacy laws and regulations, the performance of frequent audits, and the provision of training on data handling and privacy standards (Wideman, 2022).
Successful execution of the smart city concept in Hull may be ensured by the identification and mitigation of possible threats through proactive risk management.
3.2.2 Importance of Risk Management
The Hull Smart City OS project is very complicated, hence risk management is of the utmost importance. The project team can foresee issues and work up solutions to deal with or prevent them.
Large projects have a lot riding on their timelines and budgets, and both may be avoided with good risk management. Since it demonstrates proactive management and that potential issues are being handled before they develop, it also boosts stakeholder trust (Aven, 2016). Risk management isn't only about avoiding bad outcomes; it's also about making the most of positive possibilities. For instance, if a risk is discovered, it may inspire a creative response that ultimately improves the project's worth.
3.2.3 Difference between Risk Appetite and Risk Attitude
Although these phrases are often used interchangeably, they each have specific implications when discussing risk management.
The term "risk appetite" is used to describe how much and what kinds of risks a company is ready to face in order to achieve its goals (Hopkin, 2018). A company with a high propensity for risk may, for instance, be prepared to make substantial bets on emerging technologies with the hope of reaping substantial rewards if they become successful.
Figure 7 Attitude to Risk
Source: (Bromiley et al., 2015)
However, risk attitude refers to the response that an individual, group, or organisation makes in the face of an actual danger. Contrast this with the risk-seeking mindset, which may take on issues head-on and place a higher value on innovation and opportunity than stability.
Figure 8 Risk appetite VS. risk tolerance
Source: (Glendon et al., 2016)
Hull's Smart City OS's creativity allows a higher risk tolerance. The project team must take reasonable risks but not ignore potential issues.
Risk management for the Hull Smart City OS project includes risk analysis, risk registers, risk appetite, and risk attitude. The project's size and complexity necessitate these measures. The Hull project might learn from the Smart London Plan's risk management and digital twin deployment. Their risk assessment and prevention methods are informative.
3.3.1 Importance of Managing Change
Large, complicated initiatives like the Hull Smart City OS need change. As the project advances, needs, stakeholder expectations, and unanticipated events may demand project plan changes. Managing change is crucial to project success and control (Cameron, and Green, 2019). Uncontrolled modifications cause scope creep, cost overruns, timetable delays, and quality decline. Changes managed well may boost project results, stakeholder satisfaction, and value.
3.3.2 Control and Management of Project Changes
Systematically handle project modifications. Any change should be managed. The change's effect on scope, cost, time, and quality is usually assessed. Approval or rejection follows examination. The project plan is updated with approved revisions, and the timeline, budget, and resources are adjusted. Project adjustments need communication. The change, its effects, and project plan changes must be communicated to all stakeholders (Doppelt, 2017). The Hull Smart City OS project might modify software features, hardware specs, or distribution strategy. Change management should be followed regardless of its kind.
3.3.3 Role of a Change Control Board and Due Diligence
The process of examining and making a final decision on proposed modifications is often delegated to a Change Control Board (CCB). To maintain objectivity, the CCB often include members from several project stakeholder groups. The CCB for Hull's Smart City OS project may consist of elected officials, technologists, and citizens. The CCB does its homework by carefully considering every proposed change (Hussain et al., 2018). You must know why the change is being made, how it will affect the project, and what will happen if you don't make it.
When deciding whether or not to implement a proposed change, the CCB must weigh the benefits against the effort and resources needed. The CCB may sanction the amendment if the added functionality substantially improves the software's utility and the associated delay and cost increase are reasonable.
Large, multidimensional projects like the Hull Smart City OS may have many potential conflicts. If the team's objectives don't match, individuals have different work styles, stakeholders' expectations aren't fulfilled, there aren't enough resources, or there's a misunderstanding about who's in charge, there may be conflict.
Identifying problem areas is the first step to effective conflict resolution. Our primary stakeholders include city council members, IT corporations, user groups, and others. Their differing views on software features and functionality may cause conflict (McKibben, 2017). The project's success and all partners' goodwill rely on early detection of potentially problematic issues.
Project management requires conflict resolution. It promotes project harmony and productivity, ensuring project success. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument recommends avoiding, accommodating, competing, compromising, and cooperating. Situation and conflict dictate tactics. Resource allocation disputes in Hull Smart City OS might be resolved collaboratively. All parties are encouraged to share their concerns and work together to find a solution that benefits everyone. However, work style clashes may need compromise. To settle problems peacefully, the project manager must encourage open, polite, and productive communication within the team and with stakeholders.
Dispute detection and resolution mechanisms for the Hull Smart City OS project:
Scope Creep Conflict | When stakeholders ask for additions or adjustments outside of the originally envisioned scope, tensions might occur. The project manager may lessen the likelihood of disagreement by establishing and communicating clear parameters for the project from the start. Scope creep may be successfully managed by implementing a change management process that evaluates the effect of proposed modifications on the project's scope, schedule, and budget (De Janasz et al., 2019). Scope creep may be avoided by regularly engaging stakeholders and by establishing reasonable expectations. |
Resource Allocation Conflict | Disputes may arise from conflicting needs for scarce resources, known as a resource allocation conflict. The project manager should plan resources early on to determine what is needed and how to best use the available resources. The project manager may minimise disagreements over resource availability and guarantee optimum utilisation by developing a resource allocation strategy that takes into account project priorities, important activities, and stakeholder needs. |
Communication Conflict | Disagreements may arise from insufficient or inefficient communication. Project managers are responsible for facilitating open and transparent communication among team members and stakeholders, as well as establishing and maintaining effective communication channels. Listening attentively, soliciting input, and responding quickly to concerns are all essential components of effective communication. Misunderstandings and disagreements may be avoided by creating a culture of cooperation that values open and honest communication. |
Technical Conflict | Disagreements may emerge about which technologies should be used and how they should be implemented inside the smart city operating system. A project manager may lessen this risk by encouraging teamwork and decision-making by all parties involved (Costa et al., 2015). Involving specialists in the field, completing technological reviews, and running pilots or proofs of concept may all aid in determining the best technical solutions and reducing disagreements amongst stakeholders. |
Stakeholder Conflict | Disagreements amongst stakeholders may arise when those involved have different goals or expectations. The project manager is responsible for proactively locating relevant parties, understanding their priorities, and designing strategies to address their problems. Building trust, managing expectations, and decreasing disputes are all outcomes that result from the project manager including stakeholders in conversations, soliciting their feedback, and resolving their concerns. Misunderstandings and disagreements may be avoided through consistent communication and open decision-making. |
Decision-making Conflict | Disagreement and uncertainty in project decision-making may lead to conflicts. The project manager is responsible for creating a decision-making structure, assigning roles, and informing all involved of the criteria that will be used to make calls. Conflicts may be reduced by promoting open communication and group decision-making. Methods like as brainstorming, establishing consensus, and mediation may be used to help parties come to an agreement. |
The project manager for the Hull Smart City OS project may foster an atmosphere favourable to conflict resolution and project success via the use of proactive measures, effective communication, stakeholder participation, and conflict resolution tactics.
Conflict management and project success depend on negotiation. It involves people with different interests talking to find a compromise. Distributive and integrative bargaining are popular tactics.
Project managers favour 'principled negotiating'. In a complicated project like the Hull Smart City OS, this strategy emphasises reciprocal benefits, long-term partnerships, and interest-based resolution (Griffin et al., 2016).
The project manager, stakeholders, and stakeholders themselves may negotiate in this project. The municipal government and user communities may see system functions differently. Principled bargaining may reveal shared interests like improved public services and lead to a win-win settlement.
Leadership and management practises have a substantial impact on the efficiency and long-term viability of the Hull Smart City OS project. There are many different types of leadership, but two that jump out as particularly useful for this undertaking are transformational leadership and servant leadership.
As the team works to develop a comprehensive smart city operating system, a leader's ability to inspire and encourage their followers to work towards a common goal is crucial. Leaders who are capable of change may help the Hull Smart City initiative succeed by creating a culture that values and rewards original thought (Rahim, 2023). The Smart Dubai programme is a great illustration of innovative leadership in action. In her role as Director General of the Smart Dubai Office, Dr. Aisha Bin Bishr demonstrated transformative leadership by advocating for cutting-edge smart solutions and encouraging a "digital first" mentality, both of which were crucial to establishing Dubai as a pioneer in the field of smart city technology.
Conversely, servant leadership is a style that prioritises the group's needs above those of the leader, creating a setting that is conducive to cooperation. These are fundamental in coordinating the many moving parts of the Hull Smart City OS project. The smart city development in Amsterdam is a great example of servant leadership in action. Under the guidance of programme manager Frans-Anton Vermast, the Amsterdam Smart City (ASC) project encouraged collaboration between people, corporations, and government in order to develop smart city solutions.
Both transformational and servant leadership aim to ensure the development and success of their teams, but they use different paths to get there. The former is more visionary and creative, while the latter is more team-oriented and collaborative. The Hull Smart City OS project would benefit greatly from a synthesis of these two approaches since it would foster an innovative, collaborative atmosphere.
Biases are a common roadblock in the path of effective decision making and issue resolution. Methods such as encouraging a range of perspectives, implementing structured decision-making protocols, and providing bias awareness training can help reduce common biases such as confirmation bias, in which decision-makers give more weight to information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, and anchoring bias, in which individuals place disproportionate weight on the first piece of information encountered (the 'anchor') (Folger et al., 2021).
It is suggested that the Hull Smart City OS project use a blend of transformational and servant leadership styles. The project may benefit from having a leader that is both visionary and motivating, as well as collaborative and team-focused, as a servant leader would be. By striking a healthy middle ground, leaders have a better chance of fostering a cohesive team and propelling an expansive vision for the project to fruition.
The project manager for the Hull Smart City OS must use strategic thinking and great management abilities to assemble a highly effective team. The first step in creating a smart city is gaining an appreciation for its complex set of requirements. It is expected that many different sectors, including transport, health care, energy, waste management, and more, would be brought together under the Hull Smart City OS initiative. Therefore, the project team should consist of data analysts, software engineers, urban planners, and sustainability experts, all of whom bring unique expertise to the table and complement each other.
Diversity is the lifeblood of every productive team, since it is the primary source of new ideas and original approaches. When appropriately leveraged, the ideas, views, and problem-solving methodologies present in a team with a wide range of backgrounds may greatly improve the project's outcomes (Hussain et al., 2018). In order to meet the wide range of demands of Hull's population, the Smart City OS project in Hull requires a similarly broad staff. The smart city project's efficacy and social acceptability would both increase with the inclusion of a diverse staff in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and other relevant demographics.
However, there are obstacles to overcome while creating and leading a diverse workforce. Team members from different cultural backgrounds sometimes have quite different ways of doing things, thinking about their job, communicating with one another, and solving problems. This has the potential to cause confusion and arguments. Unconscious bias training, cultural competence seminars, and an inclusive communication protocol are just a few of the tools available to the project manager for overcoming these obstacles. As a result, misunderstandings and disputes would be less likely to arise and foster a culture of mutual respect and understanding.
Figure 9 EDI
Source: (DuBois et al., 2015)
EDI (Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion) cannot disregard structural impediments that particular social and cultural groups face. These discriminating elements are gradually eradicated in an inclusive environment. By requiring all-level engagement, the project manager can help. This can be done by enforcing a zero-tolerance policy against discrimination and harassment, offering flexible scheduling to accommodate employees' lifestyles, and creating an emotionally safe workplace where everyone feels heard and respected.
Leadership is essential to creating an inclusive environment. Project managers should demonstrate these values. Leaders must stress empathy, open conversation, and acceptance to create an inclusive environment. This motivates and inspires the crew.
Activities that foster respect and camaraderie among team members from diverse backgrounds may also be beneficial (Cripe, and Burleigh, 2022). Such gatherings would help team members connect and learn about each other's work habits, cultural nuances, and basic values.
The Hull Smart City OS project manager must aggressively encourage diversity, establish a diverse staff, and lead. Creative problem-solving, project buy-in, and diversity surpass the challenges. Actively recruiting and embracing individuals from different backgrounds and viewpoints may boost the project's efficacy and social impact.
Hull's Smart City OS project, in conclusion, has tremendous potential to make Hull a world-class smart city. This initiative seeks to revolutionise municipal administration via efficient project management, stakeholder involvement, and the growth of a diverse and high-performing staff. Project management expertise, stakeholder relations, and the dynamic between project triangle elements have all been highlighted in this research. It has also highlighted the value of inclusive cooperation, strategies for reducing prejudice, and successful leadership. The paper has helped shed light on effective methods of project management by referencing relevant academic literature and relying on real-world experiences. As Hull prepares to become a smart city, the Hull Smart City OS project exemplifies the community's aspiration, resiliency, and dedication to a brighter future. Hull has the potential to be a pioneer in developing connected and sustainable urban environments that improve the quality of life for its citizens because to the city's commitment to technology, innovation, and sustainability.
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., Havela, L. and Savage, G., 2015. Stakeholder dynamics during the project front-end: the case of nuclear waste repository projects. Project management journal, 46(6), pp.15-41. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pmj.21549?journalCode=pmxa
Al Amri, T., Puskas Khetani, K. and Marey-Perez, M., 2021. Towards sustainable i4. 0: key skill areas for project managers in GCC construction industry. Sustainability, 13(15), p.8121. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/15/8121
Aragonés-Beltrán, P., García-Melón, M. and Montesinos-Valera, J., 2017. How to assess stakeholders' influence in project management? A proposal based on the Analytic Network Process. International journal of project management, 35(3), pp.451-462. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786317300261
Araújo, C. and Pedron, C.D., 2016. The Importance of Soft Skills and it Project Managers’ Personality Type. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 1(1), pp.40-59. https://openaccessojs.com/JBReview/article/view/8
Aven, T., 2016. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), pp.1-13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715011479
Bourne, L., 2016. Stakeholder relationship management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. CRC Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vGPeCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Stakeholder+Influence+Map&ots=wF3BDY4LdI&sig=CJ18OO_aCf5i3zAPiMAs2n3cIrU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Stakeholder%20Influence%20Map&f=false
Brière, S., Proulx, D., Flores, O.N. and Laporte, M., 2015. Competencies of project managers in international NGOs: Perceptions of practitioners. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), pp.116-125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786314000751
Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A. and Rustambekov, E., 2015. Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long range planning, 48(4), pp.265-276. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024630114000582
Bronte-Stewart, M., 2015. Beyond the iron triangle: Evaluating aspects of success and failure using a project status model. Computing & Information Systems, 19(2), pp.19-36. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Malcolm-Bronte-Stewart/publication/289976715_Beyond_the_Iron_Triangle_Evaluating_Aspects_of_Success_and_Failure_using_a_Project_Status_Model/links/5693c15008aeab58a9a2a8ab/Beyond-the-Iron-Triangle-Evaluating-Aspects-of-Success-and-Failure-using-a-Project-Status-Model.pdf
Cameron, E. and Green, M., 2019. Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LX-5DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Change+Management&ots=v-nLQiWNHq&sig=MoN00A4Tq45NUT7-NCphUiXYo-s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Change%20Management&f=false
Costa, P.L., Passos, A.M. and Bakker, A.B., 2015. Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(4), pp.211-227. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ncmr.12061
Cripe, K.M. and Burleigh, C., 2022. Examining leadership skills, behaviors, and effective communication for virtual IT project managers. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 28(3/4), pp.223-237. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TPM-11-2021-0085/full/html?utm_campaign=Emerald_HR_PPV_November22_RoN
De Janasz, S., Dowd, K. and Schneider, B., 2019. Interpersonal Skills in Organizations, 6e. http://ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com.s3.amazonaws.com/unitas/highered/changes/dejanasz-interpersonal-skills-in-organizations-6e.pdf
Doppelt, B., 2017. Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3qk0DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=Change+Management&ots=GlqmHzleRv&sig=RbwyX0snMs97yDemwpAlj2oioPA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Change%20Management&f=false
DuBois, M., Hanlon, J., Koch, J., Nyatuga, B. and Kerr, N., 2015. Leadership styles of effective project managers: Techniques and traits to lead high performance teams. Journal of Economic Development, Management, IT, Finance, and Marketing, 7(1), p.30. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/63813574/leadership_style_high_performance_team20200702-8081-1nifyl0-libre.pdf?1593737985=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DLeadership_Styles_of_Effective_Project_M.pdf&Expires=1687287504&Signature=AvlYQ7oJL2IqMdgjnj-2YXi2uYM1PrvofjIG6KVUaxrlAR9PB8oeWOpRoo5DWMdzOGSTLjPjVfdKjIOhF3RQ~m-WLaYtr~ijohT3pGrzriSn0ovzfHulWhK6NhNAFY~U700JC3z0Jl-~Ki921fwjArjyy0e5K5QZq0pvMEl-RaE-6OzohrT5V44rJiF8tnkww-ijqEPZ6JpooVV~kUMlW27Y0fqY6ghvWRFeMU4jDBhUAd2i2Y7nJeqq8nqk~-WTwSvclHnA3A0SxkBFrbqHVBpc5Vvdo~i0P0D2g7ljjVhCNQ6vAR4jurkc5wMgXGRBKiUqUQ9mJ1EMwFF7rb8XFQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Elsawah, S., Guillaume, J.H., Filatova, T., Rook, J. and Jakeman, A.J., 2015. A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: from cognitive maps to agent-based models. Journal of environmental management, 151, pp.500-516. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479714005696
Falkner, E.M. and Hiebl, M.R., 2015. Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence. The Journal of Risk Finance, 16(2), pp.122-144. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jrf-06-2014-0079/full/html
Folger, J.P., Poole, M.S. and Stutman, R.K., 2021. Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=kHAdEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=MANAGING+PEOPLE+AND+TEAMS+Conflicts+and+Negotiation&ots=-Aop5TjPwF&sig=4rG6NIHjAdEwDveXHEbdfWqzzh4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=MANAGING%20PEOPLE%20AND%20TEAMS%20Conflicts%20and%20Negotiation&f=false
Ford, D.N. and Lyneis, J.M., 2020. System dynamics applied to project management: a survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics: Theory and Applications, pp.285-314. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4939-8790-0_658
García-Nieto, A.P., Quintas-Soriano, C., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Montes, C. and Martín-López, B., 2015. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders׳ profiles. Ecosystem Services, 13, pp.141-152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212041614001351
Gemünden, H.G., 2015. Success factors of global new product development programs, the definition of project success, knowledge sharing, and special issues of project management journal®. Project Management Journal, 46(1), pp.2-11. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pmj.21480?journalCode=pmxa
Glendon, A.I., Clarke, S. and McKenna, E., 2016. Human safety and risk management. Crc Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=u9O1bblQHFEC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Importance+of+Risk+Management&ots=q8IquW6qny&sig=XWPr9KKrNjgVlqay3xzD_yodbTI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Importance%20of%20Risk%20Management&f=false
Griffin, R.W., Phillips, J.M. and Gully, S.M., 2016. Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4ZYzCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=MANAGING+PEOPLE+AND+TEAMS+Conflicts+and+Negotiation&ots=lu1B9CAK4f&sig=vd58U5s9gzy8CoAljdv25AGcE-Q&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=MANAGING%20PEOPLE%20AND%20TEAMS%20Conflicts%20and%20Negotiation&f=false
Heagney, J., 2016. Fundamentals of project management. Amacom. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Vy58DAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR2&dq=Managing+Resources+and+Mitigating+Risks+in+projects+&ots=7plfK0QN0e&sig=p7YwtQ_AEfcICcVla3oeFzRP_QQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Managing%20Resources%20and%20Mitigating%20Risks%20in%20projects&f=false
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H. and Talluri, S., 2015. Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), pp.5031-5069. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
Hopkin, P., 2018. Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bzFiDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Managing+Resources+and+Mitigating+Risks+in+projects+&ots=5RCWCPU9E8&sig=pJEsTh0We4kkvxGDjPNC_g3En1U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Managing%20Resources%20and%20Mitigating%20Risks%20in%20projects&f=false
Hopkin, P., 2018. Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bzFiDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Importance+of+Risk+Management&ots=5RCWCPV2H6&sig=OCXABPT8thf1Yv5Ae-DdgKqlyZY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Importance%20of%20Risk%20Management&f=false
Hussain, S.T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M.J., Hussain, S.H. and Ali, M., 2018. Kurt Lewin's change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), pp.123-127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X16300087
Kliem, R.L. and Ludin, I.S., 2019. Reducing project risk. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8D73DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Managing+Resources+and+Mitigating+Risks+in+projects+&ots=d8AtX5iFCg&sig=1zKlVa-SWVVpSJig5uBu3-Y1Q9E&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Managing%20Resources%20and%20Mitigating%20Risks%20in%20projects&f=false
Maqbool, R., Sudong, Y., Manzoor, N. and Rashid, Y., 2017. The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: An empirical perspective. Project Management Journal, 48(3), pp.58-75. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/875697281704800304?journalCode=pmxa
Mateo, J., Navamuel, E. and Villa, M., 2017. Are project managers ready for the 21th challenges? A review of problem structuring methods for decision support. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5(2), pp.43-56. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ijispm/vol5/iss2/4/
McKibben, L., 2017. Conflict management: importance and implications. British Journal of Nursing, 26(2), pp.100-103. https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.2.100
Pollack, J., Helm, J. and Adler, D., 2018. What is the Iron Triangle, and how has it changed?. International journal of managing projects in business, 11(2), pp.527-547. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMPB-09-2017-0107/full/html
Rahim, M.A., 2023. Managing conflict in organizations. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zQa6EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1934&dq=MANAGING+PEOPLE+AND+TEAMS+Conflicts+and+Negotiation&ots=sENIEsq1LV&sig=UULQMFnuxG6FbJSSmA-1iXiqkcA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=MANAGING%20PEOPLE%20AND%20TEAMS%20Conflicts%20and%20Negotiation&f=false
Simchi-Levi, D., Schmidt, W., Wei, Y., Zhang, P.Y., Combs, K., Ge, Y., Gusikhin, O., Sanders, M. and Zhang, D., 2015. Identifying risks and mitigating disruptions in the automotive supply chain. Interfaces, 45(5), pp.375-390. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/inte.2015.0804
Wideman, R.M., 2022. Project and program risk management a guide to managing project risks and opportunities. Project Management Institute, Inc.. http://portal.belesparadisecollege.edu.et:8080/library/bitstream/123456789/3396/1/1.%28The%20PMBOK%20handbook%20series%29%20Wideman%20R.M.%20-%20Project%20and%20Program%20Risk%20Management_%20A%20Guide%20to%20Managing%20Project%20Risks%20and%20Opportunities-Project%20Management%20Institute%20%281992%29.pdf
