The administration of intelligent communities in OS configurable communities represents a relatively emerging phenomenon in the globe today. Multiple domains are attempting to govern this endeavour to improve the quality of existence and maintain custody of numerous factors including social, ecological, and financial development. The purpose of this investigation is to provide recommendations and recommendations for ongoing smart city development as well as development in Hull City to the initiative’s administrator of Hull City Council. Furthermore, this paper aims to discuss several difficulties related to smart cities and provide solutions to bring Hull one step nearer to achieving its urbanisation goals. A large number of the tasks in the current project were evaluated unbiased by the researcher.
A multifaceted project manager is needed to oversee the Hull Smart City OS development. Below are a few essential competencies for the position:
Technical expertise: The project administrator has to be well-versed in all intellectual elements of the work, particularly programming, and data analysis, alongside technologies for Smart Cities. They will be equipped to interact with the initiative’s staff while making well-informed judgments thanks to this expertise.
Capabilities for Administration: As per Yap and Skitmore (2020), to efficiently handle numerous assignments, schedules, and assets, a project administrator must possess an excellent degree of discipline. Moreover, the achievement of the endeavour is influenced by effective organising abilities, which guarantee that activities are finished on schedule and under the allocated funds.
Leadership: In order to inspire and direct the project staff, the head of the project has to be an outstanding leader. Moreover, they have become competent to assign work, establish explicit objectives, and offer direction and assistance when required. Having strong leadership guarantees that the undertaking remains on course and achieves its goals.
Interaction: Being an effective communicator is essential for project managers (Alvarenga et al., 2019). They must interact with teammates, outside collaborators, and stakeholders in an efficient manner. Additionally, having straightforward and brief communication facilitates dispute resolution, intention management, and agreement among all parties.
Risk Control: When it comes to risk administration, the project administrator ought to be cautious. Efficient risk management guarantees seamless development performance and reduces project holdups.
Resolving Challenges: A successful project administrator must be able to spot and fix issues (Ali et al., 2021). When presented with obstacles, they have become competent to foresee possible problems, create alternative strategies, and act quickly. Proficient problem-solving abilities will reduce interruptions and assist in maintaining the project’s timeline.
It takes a mix of formal instruction, job-based instruction, and hands-on practice to cultivate the aforementioned abilities. Following are a few suggestions for honing these abilities:
Mentoring: Consult with seasoned project managers for assistance and insightful commentary (Alkhudary and Gardiner, 2021). A role model may supply advice on improving abilities, share situations, and assist the project administrator in overcoming obstacles.
Programs and Instruction: Participate in classes and seminars aimed at enhancing certain competence sets. It is crucial to seek out classes that address subjects like managing risks, interpersonal skills, administration, and solving issues. These courses offer useful skills and resources that may be used on actual assignments.
Experience: Get hands-on experience by taking on different responsibilities in initiatives. Prioritise minor jobs at first, then advance to harder activities (Kay et al., 2019). Moreover, this practical knowledge will support the development of resolving issues, administration, and interpersonal abilities.
Ongoing Education: Keep abreast of the most recent developments and industry standards in managing projects (Pan and Zhang, 2021). Moreover, it is essential to attend seminars, sign up for professional relationships, and study newspapers, magazines, and websites about managing projects. By continuing to study, the project manager may keep up to date and be able to adapt innovative methods and strategies to any kind of assignment.
Identification of Stakeholders in the Hull Smart City OS Project
Internal Stakeholders | External Stakeholders |
Project team/group: Those working on the undertaking straight away, such as architects, managers of the undertaking, and other supporting personnel. City Council: The ruling authority in charge of formulating policies and implementing decisions. Local authorities: Numerous agencies that will communicate with the network include amenities, law enforcement, and commuting. Project Client: Responsible for handling the financial domain for the progress of the project. IT Departments: The Smart City OS’s assistance in technology and facilities is under the purview of this unit. | Local people: The main individuals who gain from the Smart City projects. Businesses: Companies nearby that the development may affect or profit. Supply Corporations: Suppliers of the required amenities that the project requires to interface with. Educational Establishments: Universities and laboratories that can offer knowledge and creativity. Innovation Collaborators: Suppliers and utility providers with innovative ideas for smart cities. Statutory Entities: Organisations that make certain rules as well as procedures are followed. |
Stakeholder Influence Map
Stakeholder Group | Interest | Influence | Impact |
Project Team | High | High | High |
City Council | High | High | High |
Local Authorities | Medium | Medium | High |
IT Departments | High | High | Medium |
Local People | High | Low | High |
Businesses | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Supply Corporations | High | High | High |
Educational Establishments | Low | Medium | Medium |
Innovation Collaborators | High | High | High |
Statutory Entities | Medium | High | High |
The project group alongside the city council have a crucial role since they direct the project’s implementation as well as direction. Moreover, local citizens’ standard of life becomes immediately impacted, making them important stakeholders for whom assistance is essential (Wang et al., 2021). The incorporation and deployment of innovative innovations depend heavily on utility enterprises and technology suppliers. Statutory entities oversee the project’s adherence to constitutional requirements and have the authority to modify its duration and methodology.
Stakeholder Engagement Tactics
Assessing the Literature and Practical Examples:
Involving constituents in projects in smart cities presents a challenging endeavour that calls for a diversified strategy (Camboim, Zawislak and Pufal, 2019). The scholarly literature states that effective interaction tactics consist of:
Open and Honest Communication – As per Lee et al. (2021), updating participants on the objectives, status, and results of the project.
All-Inclusive Engagement - Including interested parties in how decisions are made to guarantee that their demands and worries are met.
Collaborations - Collaborating with companies, educational establishments, and technological allies to make use of their assets and experience.
Sources of Feedback - Creating avenues for participants to offer suggestions and criticism across the project’s lifespan (Yuan et al., 2021).
Hull Smart City OS Project Implementation:
Presentations openly and seminars - Involve locals and companies to get comments and develop participation.
Boards of Stakeholders - Form panels to provide advice on development choices, with members drawn from primary stakeholders (O’Cathain et al., 2019).
Experimental Initiatives - Work together on trials with utilities and tech collaborators to collect information as well as show advantages (Johnson et al., 2020).
Workshops for Legislative Enforcement - Collaborate with authorities to make certain the undertaking complies with every relevant law and to foresee any new ones.
One of the core ideas of managing projects includes the project triangle (Hassan, Adeleke and Taofeeq, 2019). Moreover, as per Meredith and Zwikael (2020), three variables make up this set: scope, time, and cost. Moreover, these variables are interconnected which has a big influence on how well an initiative works, like the Hull Smart City OS initiative.
Figure 1: The Project Triangle
(Source: Hassan, Adeleke and Taofeeq, 2019)
Scope: The undertaking’s objectives, outcomes, and functionalities are outlined in the scope (Meredith and Zwikael, 2020). Moreover, it establishes the initiative’s parameters and the tasks that must be completed (Lishner and Shtub, 2019). The focus of this initiative includes the particular features and functions of the platform (operating system) for smart cities. When making a guarantee that every stakeholder involved is aware of the initiative’s goals, helps to establish the scope precisely.
Time: Kabirifar and Mojtahedi (2019) stated that time corresponds to the timeframe or budget of the endeavour. Together with the timetable of every assignment or period, it also specifies beginning and finish deadlines. Moreover, as per Lishner and Shtub (2019), time plays a vital role since it establishes the general span of the undertaking as well as the completion dates of particular stages. Hence, time administration is essential in this initiative to guarantee that it has been created and put into use in the allotted amount of period.
Cost: The term “cost” describes the amount of money needed to finish the job (Meredith and Zwikael, 2020). Additionally, it encompasses expenditures for employees, supplies, machinery, and administration. Kabirifar and Mojtahedi (2019) claimed that to make certain the undertaking stays inside the funds allotted, cost management is crucial. Therefore, cost control is crucial to this undertaking to guarantee the OS’s creation and release are economically viable.
Since modifications to a single parameter might affect another two, the relationship across those variables is sometimes identified as the “triangle” (Thesing, Feldmann and Burchardt, 2021). The interrelation of these is conducted below.
v The Hull Smart City OS initiative may become costlier if its scope gets wider to incorporate further operations. This might happen if greater funds and time are needed.
v In order to stay under budget, this undertaking might want to reduce its extent or inject more assets if its timetable is reduced to fulfil a time plan.
v If this initiative’s funding is cut, it can be necessary to shorten the initiative’s duration or lower its scope to make room for the available funds.
The Project Management Body of Knowledge, or PMBOK, states that handling these limitations entails balancing them to get the optimal venture result (Zamri et al., 2023). It also serves as a collection of accepted language as well as the administration of project rules. For example, ineffective project triangle management resulted in major mistakes and excessive costs within the check-in infrastructure program at Denver International Airport (Www5.in.tum.de, 2023).
Resources Needed for the Undertaking
The Hull Smart City OS initiative may necessitate a few specific assets:
Personnel or Human Resource: Competent managers of projects, analysts of information, IT specialists, and other assistance personnel.
Innovation: Programming instruments, licenses for applications, machines, and networking components.
Establishments: Storage facilities, conference accommodations, and workplaces.
Resources: Workplace materials, wires, shelving, and hardware elements.
Facilities: Agreements for servicing, consultancy, and cloud-based services.
An efficient method for estimating costs
The Parametric Estimating approach might serve as a useful cost-estimating strategy for this initiative (Sebastian, 2023). As per Udoagwu (2022), this method determines an undertaking assessment by applying statistical correlations between previous information and various additional parameters. This can be especially helpful for initiatives related to smart cities that employ comparable infrastructure elements.
The Value of Establishing Baselines
Since baselining creates an overview to guide the undertaking’s scope, budget, and timeline, it has become essential (Wrike, 2023). Additionally, it aids in conveniently controlling adjustments and monitoring advancement. According to Rehkope (2023), it also offers a framework for assessing project success and coming to wise judgments.
Finding the Critical Path
The most extensive set of tasks in an undertaking that needs to be finished on schedule for everything to get finished by the deadline is known as the critical path (Markgraf, 2016). Determining the critical route is crucial since it indicates which activities cannot be postponed without compromising the project’s deadline. Furthermore, it aids in work prioritising and distributing assets. As added by Pinto (2022), it additionally renders it possible to deal with risk adequately by concentrating on important tasks.
Comparing Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cost Estimating
Top-Down Method: Predictions are put forward to specific elements after being calculated from the venture’s overall expenditures (Ning, Pei and Huang, 2020). Quicker while less thorough; ideal in the beginning stages of an undertaking or when knowledge is scarce. As opined by Frame et al. (2020), because it depends on experienced opinion and previous research, it could prove a little inaccurate.
Bottom-Up Method: Wentker, Greenwood and Leker (2019) identified that to make projections, the entire undertaking must be divided into segments, all of which must be estimated separately. Highly precise and thorough since it takes certain activities and capabilities into account (Li, Su and Wang, 2020, April). Furthermore, it is lengthy and necessitates in-depth project knowledge.
Scholarly Writings and Practical Projects
As per Arora et al. (2020) assertion, precise cost estimating is important for the triumph of an initiative and may be attained by employing diverse methodologies customised to the venture’s requirements. For instance, Rochdane and Assaber (2022) mentioned that the Smart Santander initiative successfully managed its financial resources by combining both top-down as well as bottom-up techniques.
Anything that might affect the achievement of a venture by shortening the venture’s timeframe, going over spending limits, or in another process resulting in lower completion rates is considered an undertaking risk (Martins, 2022). Moreover, as per Komarek, De Pinto and Smith (2020), an essential resource for managing risk includes a risk register, which offers a methodical way to recognise, evaluate, and reduce concerns. In this regard, the Hull Smart City OS project has six possible dangers outlined within the risk assessment further down, which is divided into several different groups.
Category of risks | Description of the risks | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategies |
| Overspending or unforeseen expenses | High | Medium | Consistent budget oversight and emergency funding |
Finanacial | Severe weather causing disruptions to project operations | Medium | High | Create a safeguarding strategy and make certain that project managers possess procedures established for recovering information and backup. |
Reputational | Unfavourable public opinion or retaliation | Medium | Medium | Open communication, involvement of the general population, and handling expectations |
Strategic | Out of harmony with the tactical aspirations of Hull City Council | Low | High | Maintaining frequent interactions with all parties involved and coordinating the assignment’s targets with council aims |
Operational | Equipment malfunctions or malfunctions | High | High | Technical assistance, backup procedures, and routine administration of systems |
Compliance | Failure to adhere to data privacy laws | Low | High | Routine audits, regulatory advice, employee development, and other |
Risk Appetite vs Risk Attitude
Two essential ideas in risk administration include risk appetite alongside risk attitude.
Risk Appetite: The level of unpredictability that an organisation of project managers or those involved are ready to accept in exchange for an advantage is known as their “risk appetite” (Chen et al., 2022). Companies take chances to achieve their operations through strategy. Furthermore, Liang et al. (2020) addressed that it pertains to the amount of uncertainty that an enterprise is prepared to take on or put up with to meet its goals. This might be the level of functioning, reputational, or monetary danger that Hull City Council remains ready to accept to pursue this Smart City OS initiative.
Risk Attitude: Usually, a company’s or individual’s risk attitude can be evaluated in quantifiable terms (Mudassir Iqbal, 2023). Whereas, individuals in any organisation have varying perspectives on risk since it describes the way a company or a person views risk. This describes the company’s philosophy or way of looking at embracing risks (Charness et al., 2020). Moreover, as remarked by Luo and Lam (2020), this may mean risk-neutral, unaffected by danger, hazard-averse, danger-seeking, or ready to embark on a hazard in exchange for possible rewards. The way in which the dangers listed in the threat register are managed will depend on the risk-taking mindset of Hull City Council.
It is essential to comprehend both ideas to handle risks effectively. The venture’s goals and approaches can be determined by the group’s risk appetite, whereas, the steps implemented in handling the threats that are discovered will be shaped by its risk-taking attitude.
Particular Significance for the Hull Smart City OS Initiative
Appropriately handling this transition is essential to guaranteeing the updated method’s adoption and profitable implementation. Throughout this initiative, change management is crucial for some considerations.
Advancements in Technology: A freshly developed operating system will be implemented as part of the undertaking, representing a substantial advancement in technology.
Administrative Shifts: As added by Allioui and Mourdi (2023), to reduce interference and guarantee that the business may employ innovative technology to its full potential, those modifications must be carefully handled.
Engaging Stakeholders: In order to guarantee that all interested parties are involved as well as in favour of the undertaking, successful change administration is crucial (Bellantuono et al., 2021).
The following table provides an overview of the significance of handling changes for this specific initiative:
Importance | Description |
Reducing Opposition | Improves acceptance and decreases opposition among stakeholders |
Lowering the Risks | Reduces the chance of things like project postponements and expense errors |
Getting Results | Raises the possibility that the initiative will succeed |
Advancements in Technology | Assures the latest system’s effective acceptance and deployment. |
Administrative Shifts | Reduces disturbance and guarantees that the updated system operates as intended |
Engaging Stakeholders | Makes certain that every stakeholder is involved and supported |
Controlling and managing changes in projects in an organisation
Framework for Managing Change: It provides a thorough strategy detailing the identification, evaluation, and management of modifications during the undertaking.
Engaging Stakeholders: Engage interested parties right away since as per Al-Aidrous et al. (2022), effective communication is essential. It is important to guarantee that everyone knows of the changes, their implications, and the advantages they offer.
Evaluation of Consequence: Examining the possible impacts of the suggested modifications seems crucial.
Adjustment and Ongoing Development: It is useful to analyse the success of the modifications that have been made (Tam et al., 2020), and if necessary, execute more modifications.
Importance of a change control board and due diligence in managing and authorising change
Importance of change control board | Importance of due diligence |
The authority to approve change requests rests with the undertaking’s change control board (Chai, 2021). Furthermore, this requires that key stakeholders who could be touched by the suggested modification receive details about its potential effects on initiative and operational preparations. ScienceDirect (2023) claimed that this is a crucial tool for keeping oversight of adjustments and making sure they advance the expansion and profitability of the company. | The procedure of reviewing a transaction’s knowledge to ensure that the agreement is lawful as well as to adequately inform both parties of all relevant information is termed due diligence (Tookitaki, 2023). Moreover, as per Marker (2023), it serves to reduce risks, guarantee compliance with regulations, and facilitate efficient choices by offering a thorough grasp of the subject at concern. It becomes a barrier to reducing risks involved with different transactions and guaranteeing educated choices. |
Real Projects
Accounting and Commercial Software: Developing dependable, safe platforms for handling transactions, handling accounts, along with information analysis is a key component in developing software for banking organisations (like SAP or Finastra) (SAP, 2023). Initiatives include risk administration networks, trading networks, or banking applications.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): REITs are not a single venture, instead being a means of acquiring, managing, and operating income-producing real estate holdings by combining the capital of several shareholders (REIT.com, 2023). It could be commercial, dwellings, or lodging establishments.
Conflict Type | Sources | Conflict Management Strategies |
Technical Decisions: Divergences may emerge about technical facets of the undertaking, including the selection of tools or layout. | Divergences in technological matters | Professional discussions or technical assessments may be employed to mediate technical disputes (Derry et al., 2020). Moreover, it has become imperative for the project administrator to guarantee that every operational judgment is grounded in objective standards, rather than subjective judgments. |
Resource Allocation: Disagreements may arise around the distribution of assets, including staff, funds, as well as time. Various goals among teammates or divisions may be the cause of this. | Inadequate resources | By guaranteeing openness in how decisions are made as well as incorporating various pertinent parties in resource scheduling, the venture administrator can settle disputes about how to allocate resources. As opined by Broussard et al. (2019), a method of resource allocation that is impartial and reasonable can aid in the avoidance of disputes. |
Change Management: Disputes may originate from reluctance to alter, particularly if the endeavour necessitates major adjustments to established structures or procedures. | Conflicts about the project’s orientation | By including constituents in the adjustment procedure and outlining the advantages of the modifications, reluctance toward modification may be controlled. Approaches for controlling transformation must be designed to address the unique requirements and worries of the partners (Brunetti et al., 2020). |
Cultural Differences: Dissimilar labour or communication methods may lead to problems if individuals from various cultures are working on the undertaking. | Conflicts on cultural matters and taking key decisions | By encouraging an environment of mutual tolerance and compassion inside the group, cultural problems may be resolved. According to Kaihlanen, Hietapakka and Heponiemi (2019), proficiency in cultural awareness may sometimes be advantageous. |
Project Priorities: Conflicts can arise from divergent opinions among stakeholders over the venture’s objectives. | Varying opinions about the significance of an activity or characteristic | Establishing the project’s goals and boundaries up front will help to prevent disagreements concerning priorities later on. Maintaining open lines for interaction among interested parties may also assist in guaranteeing everybody agrees (Galvin, Tywoniak and Sutherland, 2021). |
Communication Concerns: Inconsistencies and disputes can result from poor or nonexistent communication. | Personality clashes that can lead to miscommunication | Addressing disagreements requires effective communication (Reaser et al., 2020). The task leader holds the responsibility for guaranteeing there exists a consistent interaction route as well as ensuring every participant remains apprised of their specific duties and commitments. |
In this regard, one instrument for managing disputes includes the Thomas Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) (Mahajan and Sutar, 2022). Five conflict-handling techniques are identified: accommodating, avoiding, compromising, cooperating, and competing (Hastings, Kavookjian and Ekong, 2019). This instrument allows the project administrator to determine which conflict-handling strategy is best for a given situation. Furthermore, the project administrator may decide on the compromise approach, in which both parties release things to come to an understanding, if a disagreement exists, for instance, over how to allocate resources. The collaborative method, in which individuals cooperate to discover an arrangement that pleases all, could prove preferred if the disagreement is about technical judgments.
Real Projects
In this regard, Amsterdam’s Smart City Initiative can be outlined. A robust workforce as well as public-private collaborations proved essential to Amsterdam’s Smart City undertaking’s development (Global, 2019). Undoubtedly, data integration offers a lot of benefits, however, achieving those objectives requires city leaders to work alongside a wide range of partners from government to business. Perhaps, Whybrow (2018) stated that this is not a mere coincidence that Amsterdam has outperformed the majority of towns in the globe to this point.
Leadership styles
This Hull Smart City OS initiative might benefit from the application of many leadership styles, including:
Autocratic: This approach might not encourage teamwork, however, it might work well when hasty choices are required (Caillier, 2020).
Democratic: Personnel may feel more engaged and responsible while working in this manner, although choice-making may take longer (Nedelko and Potocan, 2021).
Transformational: This kind of leadership may encourage creativity along with excellent output, however, it needs a powerful, inspiring, and motivating figurehead (Atan and Mahmood, 2019).
Management Behaviours
The following are several crucial management practices that this Hull Smart City OS initiative might use:
Task-focused Conduct: According to Saltz (2021, December), this entails concentrating on the assignments that must be finished to meet the initiative’s objectives. Although it might ensure that assignments are finished quickly, it could not consider the requirements and incentives of teammates.
People-Centred Conduct: This necessitates the requirements and driving forces of the teammates (Mabon et al., 2021). Moreover, significant amounts of involvement alongside a pleasant team atmosphere can be fostered by it, however, job fulfilment might lack sufficient emphasis.
Moral Conduct: This entails conducting oneself in an honourable as well as accountable manner. Additionally, as per Tang and Lee (2020), this might assist teammates in developing a sense of camaraderie and confidence, yet, it also calls for a solid moral foundation and a dedication to moral behavior.
Crucial to the Achievement of the Project
The Hull Smart City OS initiative’s governance procedures and manner of leadership selection are essential to its accomplishment. As mentioned by Virgiawan, Riyanto and Endri (2021), an outstanding durability culture may be fostered as well as employees may be inspired and motivated by a manager with the correct demeanour. In addition to guaranteeing that activities are carried out successfully and smoothly, appropriate management practices could additionally promote a supportive team atmosphere.
Mitigating the different types of bias
Responsibility and Openness: Make explicit how judgments originate and promote candid conversations regarding biases.
Various Viewpoints: Personal prejudices can be lessened by the many viewpoints that others with varied experiences might provide (Quillian and Midtbøen, 2021). Smart City Amsterdam project has used this strategy.
Data-Driven Methodology: Developing decisions using reliable knowledge helps reduce the influence of biases resulting from subjective beliefs.
Consciousness and Instruction: Individuals might be assisted in identifying and acknowledging preconceptions by receiving instruction and information about them (Laletas et al., 2022). Smart City Barcelona project has used this tactic.
Recommendation of leadership styles for the Hull Smart City OS project
There are many different parties involved in this initiative, such as companies, people, and local authorities. This indicates that functions, procedures, and institutional frameworks can all shift as a result of the undertaking. Therefore, a mix of person-centred management styles alongside democratic leadership may work well for this initiative. Moreover, this might guarantee that activities are carried out successfully and expeditiously whilst fostering an interactive as well as interested workplace atmosphere. Nonetheless, the particular leadership approach and management process used must be customised to the unique requirements and environment of the workforce and the undertaking.
A project supervisor may employ the Tuckman and Jensen model, an understanding of collaborative growth that defines certain phases (Guttenberg, 2020), to create an exceptionally productive workforce for this Hull Smart City OS initiative.
Forming: The collective objectives including personal duties must be communicated explicitly by the project administrator at this point. Now seems the moment to make certain that everybody knows of the initiative’s objectives and how they fit into them.
Storming: Conflicts and confrontations could occur at this point (Vaida and Șerban, 2021). In order to encourage a healthy team atmosphere, the project administrator ought to advocate honest debate and mediation of conflicts.
Norming: As per Guttenberg (2020), at this point, the team begins to collaborate more successfully. The project leader must be confident that everybody contributes toward shared objectives and adhere to collective standards and responsibilities.
Performing: The crew is operating at peak efficiency during this period. According to Vaida and Șerban (2021), to sustain outstanding results, the project administrator must keep an eye on things and keep giving comments and acknowledgement.
Adjourning: The manager of the initiative ought to present everyone with satisfaction and acknowledgement for their efforts during the period of adjournment.
The Value of Diversity within a Group
Having a varied team may greatly enhance the outcome of an undertaking. How to do it is as follows:
Various Viewpoints: Different groups may provide creative ideas because they contribute a range of viewpoints to the board (Sim and Waterfield, 2019).
Greater Variety of Competencies: A group with diversity can tackle multiple project components since it has a broader spectrum of talents as well as perspectives.
Enhanced Originality: Because teammates with diverse experiences can handle challenges in various manners, diversity could encourage innovation (Bocquet et al., 2019).
Putting Together a Competitive Group for this Hull Smart City OS Initiative
The project administrator for this particular initiative ought to accomplish the following to assemble a strong team:
v Promote frank dialogue and constructive dispute settlement.
v Carefully state who is responsible for what.
v Encourage a supportive group atmosphere.
v Encourage variety among the squad’s members.
v Acknowledge and honour group accomplishments.
Varied teams and the difficulties of collaborating in a diversified group in terms of EDI (Equality, Diversity & Inclusion)
While building Hull’s initial and fastest-growing smart city, many kinds of workers are facing several challenges. These groups are dealing with the corresponding significant issues:
Figure 2: Challenges of working in diverse teams in terms of EDI
(Source: Author)
Obstacles to communication: If the personnel is diverse, teammates could discover it challenging to communicate with one another (Morrison-Smith and Ruiz, 2020). Since they come from diverse teams, many developers are multilingual.
Conflicts between cultures: Cultural clashes occur naturally when cultures diverge. The workforce’s productivity and administration possess a big influence.
Slower choices: Different groups are additionally opening the doors to additional debates and assertions, which could decrease the number of options (OWP, 2021).
Multiple viewpoints: All teammates ought to be capable of providing a wide range of viewpoints, and each individual ought to assume that their opinions are superior to all else’s.
Since EKEO alongside ICT controlled the departments that followed in collaboration with the legislature alongside the City Council, water system, cleanliness, conveyance, immigration and taxation, construction, and manufacturing, the Hong Kong Smart City initiative has been successful in fostering a sense of teamwork (Smartcity.gov, 2023).
The study’s conclusion indicates that Hull City’s smart operating system software is designed to handle sophisticated situations, city tourists, and locals. Additionally, the group’s abilities, several duties and requirements, and efficient taking decisions are highlighted in this study. Nevertheless, it lacks an influence on the smart city initiative’s monetary effects statistics. This study reflects that it is vital to evaluate potential hazards, expenses, schedule, and extent of any alteration and adopt a mindset that prioritises ongoing development. There exists a significant breakthrough that makes life simpler for Hull residents. Project managers require improved dispute settlement techniques through negotiation as disagreements constitute an inevitable component of working conditions.
Al-Aidrous, A.H.M., Shafiq, N., Al-Ashmori, Y.Y., Al-Mekhlafi, A.B.A. and Baarimah, A.O., 2022. Essential Factors Enhancing Industrialized Building Implementation in Malaysian Residential Projects. Sustainability, 14(18), p.11711.
Ali, M., Li, Z., Khan, S., Shah, S.J. and Ullah, R., 2021. Linking humble leadership and project success: the moderating role of top management support with mediation of team-building. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(3), pp.545-562.
Alkhudary, R. and Gardiner, P., 2021. Stages in project managers’ careers: Learning and growth opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), pp.536-545.
Allioui, H. and Mourdi, Y., 2023. Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: A comprehensive survey. Sensors, 23(19), p.8015.
Alvarenga, J.C., Branco, R.R., Guedes, A.L.A., Soares, C.A.P. and da Silveira, W., 2019. The project manager core competencies to project success. International journal of managing projects in Business, 13(2), pp.277-292.
Arora, M., Verma, S., Kavita and Chopra, S., 2020. A systematic literature review of machine learning estimation approaches in scrum projects. Cognitive Informatics and Soft Computing: Proceeding of CISC 2019, pp.573-586.
Atan, J.B. and Mahmood, N., 2019. The role of transformational leadership style in enhancing employees’ competency for organization performance. Management Science Letters, 9(13), pp.2191-2200.
Bellantuono, N., Nuzzi, A., Pontrandolfo, P. and Scozzi, B., 2021. Digital transformation models for the I4. 0 transition: Lessons from the change management literature. Sustainability, 13(23), p.12941.
Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C. and Poussing, N., 2019. Strategic CSR for innovation in SMEs: Does diversity matter?. Long Range Planning, 52(6), p.101913.
Broussard, G., Rubenstein, L.S., Robinson, C., Maziak, W., Gilbert, S.Z. and DeCamp, M., 2019. Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: a systematic review. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 4(1), pp.1-13.
Brunetti, F., Matt, D.T., Bonfanti, A., De Longhi, A., Pedrini, G. and Orzes, G., 2020. Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach. The TQM Journal, 32(4), pp.697-724.
Caillier, J.G., 2020. Testing the influence of autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, and public service motivation on citizen ratings of an agency head’s performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4), pp.918-941.
Camboim, G.F., Zawislak, P.A. and Pufal, N.A., 2019. Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, pp.154-167.
Chai, W. (2021) What is change control?, Disaster Recovery. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/searchdisasterrecovery/definition/change-control#:~:text=Change%20control%20is%20a%20systematic,and%20resources%20are%20used%20efficiently. (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Charness, G., Garcia, T., Offerman, T. and Villeval, M.C., 2020. Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 60, pp.99-123.
Chen, Z.S., Zhang, X., Rodríguez, R.M., Pedrycz, W., Martínez, L. and Skibniewski, M.J., 2022. Expertise-structure and risk-appetite-integrated two-tiered collective opinion generation framework for large-scale group decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(12), pp.5496-5510.
Derry, S.J., Gance, S., Gance, L.L. and Schlager, M., 2020. Toward assessment of knowledge-building practices in technology-mediated work group interactions. In Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 29-68). Routledge.
Frame, D.J., Wehner, M.F., Noy, I. and Rosier, S.M., 2020. The economic costs of Hurricane Harvey attributable to climate change. Climatic Change, 160, pp.271-281.
Galvin, P., Tywoniak, S. and Sutherland, J., 2021. Collaboration and opportunism in megaproject alliance contracts: The interplay between governance, trust and culture. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), pp.394-405.
Global, E. (2019) Five lessons in digital transformation from a smart city, EY US - Home. Available at: https://www.ey.com/en_es/digital/digital-transformation-smart-city-amsterdam (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Guttenberg, J.L., 2020. Group development model and Lean Six Sigma project team outcomes. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(4), pp.635-661.
Hassan, A.K., Adeleke, A.Q. and Taofeeq, D.M., 2019. The effects of project triple constraint on Malaysia Building Projects. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 3(5), pp.1222-1238.
Hastings, T.J., Kavookjian, J. and Ekong, G., 2019. Associations among student conflict management style and attitudes toward empathy. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(1), pp.25-32.
Johnson, B.A., Mader, A.D., Dasgupta, R. and Kumar, P., 2020. Citizen science and invasive alien species: An analysis of citizen science initiatives using information and communications technology (ICT) to collect invasive alien species observations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, p.e00812.
Kabirifar, K. and Mojtahedi, M., 2019. The impact of engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) phases on project performance: a case of large-scale residential construction project. Buildings, 9(1), p.15.
Kaihlanen, A.M., Hietapakka, L. and Heponiemi, T., 2019. Increasing cultural awareness: qualitative study of nurses’ perceptions about cultural competence training. BMC nursing, 18(1), pp.1-9.
Kay, J., Ferns, S., Russell, L., Smith, J. and Winchester-Seeto, T., 2019. The Emerging Future: Innovative Models of Work-Integrated Learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20(4), pp.401-413.
Komarek, A.M., De Pinto, A. and Smith, V.H., 2020. A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 178, p.102738.
Laletas, S., Grove, C., Sharma, U., OToole, T. and Kaukko, M., 2022. Breaking down the walls of the ‘Ivory Tower’: critical reflections on how co-teaching partnerships can bridge the gap between inclusive education theory and practice. Teachers and Teaching, 28(4), pp.475-495.
Lee, D., Lee, S.H., Masoud, N., Krishnan, M.S. and Li, V.C., 2021. Integrated digital twin and blockchain framework to support accountable information sharing in construction projects. Automation in construction, 127, p.103688.
Li, J., Su, W. and Wang, Z., 2020, April. Simple pose: Rethinking and improving a bottom-up approach for multi-person pose estimation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (Vol. 34, No. 07, pp. 11354-11361).
Liang, D., Wang, M., Xu, Z. and Liu, D., 2020. Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM. Information Sciences, 507, pp.585-605.
Lishner, I. and Shtub, A., 2019. Measuring the success of Lean and Agile projects: Are cost, time, scope and quality equally important?. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 7(1).
Luo, J.M. and Lam, C.F., 2020. Travel anxiety, risk attitude and travel intentions towards “travel bubble” destinations in Hong Kong: Effect of the fear of COVID-19. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21), p.7859.
Mabon, L., Nguyen, S.T., Pham, T.T., Tran, T.T., Le, H.N., Doan, T.T.H., Hoang, T.N.H., Mueller-Hirth, N. and Vertigans, S., 2021. Elaborating a people-centered approach to understanding sustainable livelihoods under climate and environmental change: Thang Binh District, Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Sustainability Science, 16, pp.221-238.
Mahajan, V.G. and Sutar, M.S.V., 2022. A STUDY OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES AMONG STUDENTS. Indian Journal of Social Sciences and Literature Studies, 8(1).
Marker, A. (2023) Due diligence types, roles, and Processes, Smartsheet. Available at: https://www.smartsheet.com/due-diligence-guide (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Markgraf, B. (2016) How to determine the Critical Path in project management, Small Business - Chron.com. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/determine-critical-path-project-management-77425.html (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Martins, J. (2022) What is an implementation plan? 6 steps to create one [2023] • asana, Asana. Available at: https://asana.com/resources/project-risk-management-process (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Meredith, J.R. and Zwikael, O., 2020. Achieving strategic benefits from project investments: Appoint a project owner. Business Horizons, 63(1), pp.61-71.
Morrison-Smith, S. and Ruiz, J., 2020. Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2, pp.1-33.
Mudassir Iqbal (2023) Risk attitude risk appetite risk tolerance and risk threshold - PMP/CAPM - mudassir iqbal, PMP, Mudassir Iqbal. Available at: https://mudassiriqbal.net/risk-attitude-appetite-tolerance-threshold/ (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Nedelko, Z. and Potocan, V., 2021. Sustainability of organizations: The contribution of personal values to democratic leadership behavior focused on the sustainability of organizations. Sustainability, 13(8), p.4207.
Ning, G., Pei, J. and Huang, H., 2020. Lighttrack: A generic framework for online top-down human pose tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 1034-1035).
O'Cathain, A., Croot, L., Duncan, E., Rousseau, N., Sworn, K., Turner, K.M., Yardley, L. and Hoddinott, P., 2019. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ open, 9(8).
OWP (2021) The benefits and challenges of a diverse team - download whitepaper (PDF), OnlineWhitePapers.com. Available at: https://www.onlinewhitepapers.com/human-resources/the-benefits-and-challenges-of-a-diverse-team/ (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
Pan, Y. and Zhang, L., 2021. A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Automation in Construction, 124, p.103564.
Pinto, J.K., 2022. Avoiding the inflection point: Project management theory and research after 40 years. International Journal of Project Management, 40(1), pp.4-8.
Quillian, L. and Midtbøen, A.H., 2021. Comparative perspectives on racial discrimination in hiring: The rise of field experiments. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, pp.391-415.
Reaser, J.K., Burgiel, S.W., Kirkey, J., Brantley, K.A., Veatch, S.D. and Burgos-Rodríguez, J., 2020. The early detection of and rapid response (EDRR) to invasive species: a conceptual framework and federal capacities assessment. Biological Invasions, 22, pp.1-19.
Rehkope, M. (2023) Understanding project baseline in Project Management, Atlassian. Available at: https://www.atlassian.com/agile/project-management/project-baseline (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
REIT.com (2023) What’s a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust)?, What is a REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust)? | REIT.com. Available at: https://www.reit.com/what-reit (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Rochdane, H. and Assaber, O., 2022. Informal collaboration: building a smart city through self-organized stakeholders. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, 6(1), pp.9-17.
Saltz, J.S., 2021, December. Crisp-dm for data science: Strengths, weaknesses and potential next steps. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2337-2344). IEEE.
SAP (2023) Spend Management Software Solutions | SAP. Available at: https://www.sap.com/products/spend-management.html (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
ScienceDirect (2023) Change Control Board, Change Control Board - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/change-control-board#:~:text=The%20project%20change%20control%20board,be%20impacted%20by%20the%20change. (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Sebastian (2023) Parametric estimating: Definition, examples, uses, Project. Available at: https://project-management.info/parametric-estimating/ (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Sim, J. and Waterfield, J., 2019. Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Quality & quantity, 53(6), pp.3003-3022.
Smartcity.gov (2023) Hong Kong smart city blueprint 2. Available at: https://www.smartcity.gov.hk/modules/custom/custom_global_js_css/assets/files/HKSmartCityBlueprint(ENG)v2.pdf (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
Tam, C., da Costa Moura, E.J., Oliveira, T. and Varajão, J., 2020. The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), pp.165-176.
Tang, B.L. and Lee, J.S.C., 2020. A reflective account of a research ethics course for an interdisciplinary cohort of graduate students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), pp.1089-1105.
Thesing, T., Feldmann, C. and Burchardt, M., 2021. Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Computer Science, 181, pp.746-756.
Tookitaki (2023) The importance of due diligence in making informed decisions, The Importance of Due Diligence in Making Informed Decisions. Available at: https://www.tookitaki.com/glossary/due-diligence#:~:text=The%20primary%20purpose%20of%20due,of%20the%20matter%20at%20hand. (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Udoagwu, K. (2022) Parametric estimating in Project Management: Wrike, Blog Wrike. Available at: https://www.wrike.com/blog/guide-to-parametric-estimating-in-project-management/ (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Vaida, S.E.B.A.S.T.I.A.N. and Șerban, D., 2021. Group development stages. A brief comparative analysis of various models. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Psychologia-Paedagogia, 66(1), pp.91-110.
Virgiawan, A.R., Riyanto, S. and Endri, E., 2021. Organizational culture as a mediator motivation and transformational leadership on employee performance. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), pp.67-79.
Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Gao, X. and Gao, B., 2021. Collaborative decision-making for urban regeneration: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Land Use Policy, 107, p.105479.
Wentker, M., Greenwood, M. and Leker, J., 2019. A bottom-up approach to lithium-ion battery cost modeling with a focus on cathode active materials. Energies, 12(3), p.504.
Whybrow, M. (2018) Which cities are Truly ‘smart’? Amsterdam is rightly held up as a flagship so how did it achieve so much in the last ten years?, Smarter Communities Media. Available at: https://smartercommunities.media/truly-smart-city-five-lessons-amsterdam/ (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Wrike (2023) What is a project baseline in project management?: Wrike, Versatile & Robust Project Management Software. Available at: https://www.wrike.com/project-management-guide/faq/what-is-a-baseline-in-project-management-project-baseline/ (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Www5.in.tum.de (2023) Denver International Airport - Baggage System - case study. Available at: https://www5.in.tum.de/~huckle/DIABaggage.pdf (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
Yap, J.B.H. and Skitmore, M., 2020. Ameliorating time and cost control with project learning and communication management: Leveraging on reusable knowledge assets. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(4), pp.767-792.
Yuan, M., Li, Z., Li, X. and Luo, X., 2021. Managing stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in the life cycle of prefabricated building projects: A social network analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, p.129102.
Zamri, M.B., Dahri, N.A., Jaafar, N.A.N., Rahman, D.S.A., Haizal, M.K.H., Ismail, N.F.A., Halim, S.N., James, S.R. and Sulaiman, N.L., 2023. PMBok Knowledge Areas: Case Study of Project and Stakeholder Management Fail Lessons Learned. Applied Information Technology And Computer Science, 4(2), pp.2274-2281.