Topic-:
“The Challenges in Achieving sustainability in the UK Construction work”
Abstract
This dissertation provides a comprehensive analysis of the problems, regulatory effects, possible solutions, and case studies of successful sustainable practise implementation in UK construction projects. Through an examination of secondary data from previously conducted studies and use of a theme analytic methodology, this investigation aims to provide answers to four research questions. The research exposes a web of interconnected problems, from financial restraints to technological hurdles to a convoluted regulatory framework to competing stakeholder priorities. The findings show that there are many obstacles to overcome, but they are not insurmountable. Sustainability initiatives have been stifled and propelled in equal measure by government rules and industry standards. Further, the research outlines a number of techniques and recommended practises that may lessen the negative effects of the difficulties, with evidence from successful case studies to back up the claims. This study provides specifics on each topic area, allowing engineering project managers to more easily incorporate sustainable practises into their work. In addition to informing policy implications, the results help to close a gap in the research by bringing together previously disparate topics and approaches. This study provides not only a theoretical advancement but also a useful manual for anyone involved in the relevant field.
Acknowledgement
My sincere appreciation goes out to all of my professors and classmates who provided me with helpful feedback and encouragement during my study. Their knowledge and support were crucial to the success of this research project.
Thank you
Chapter 1
Rising environmental consciousness and interest in sustainable development have marked the beginning of the 21st century. The building business is profoundly affected by the worldwide push for sustainability, which cuts across many fields. As of 2022, the construction industry in the United Kingdom is projected to employ over 2 million people and contribute an estimated 7 percent to the country's GDP (Uzoigwe et al., 2023). Although economically significant, the sector has long been seen as a major source of environmental deterioration, responsible for over 40% of the United Kingdom's total carbon emissions and producing roughly 60% of the country's total garbage (Tabassi et al., 2016).
The concept of sustainability during construction calls for a holistic strategy that considers the financial, social, and ecological consequences of building. In terms of environmental impact, sustainable building practises prioritise efficient resource utilisation, waste minimization, and minimum site disturbance (Darko et al., 2017). The social focus is on making buildings and its inhabitants safer and healthier for everyone. Financially, sustainability means low costs, both now and during the building's whole useful lifespan (Walker, 2015).
The shift in emphasis towards sustainable building is not only a personal choice in the face of the grave dangers presented by global warming and resource depletion (Levy, 2018). The government of the United Kingdom has recognised this and has pledged to attain a net-zero carbon emission target by 2050, a goal that will need substantial transformation in the building industry (Alnaggar, and Pitt, 2019).
Despite this renewed commitment to sustainability, there are many obstacles to overcome before sustainable practises can be widely adopted in the UK construction industry (Alwan, et al., 2017). One of the main obstacles is the potential financial outlay. Stakeholders motivated by immediate financial returns may be dissuaded from investing in sustainable technologies and materials because of the higher upfront costs associated with doing so (Myers, 2022).
Problems may occur on a technical level (Iqbal et al., 2015). Conventional resistance to change in the construction sector, as well as a lack of knowledge and experience in sustainable technology and procedures, may be barriers to their adoption (Newman et al., 2021). Solutions for sustainability are generally complicated and cross-disciplinary, requiring adjustments at every stage from initial concept to ongoing management (Alaloul et al., 2020).
Another difficulty arises from the perspectives and anticipations of stakeholders (Kivilä et al., 2017). Conflicts and obstacles to sustainable construction can arise from the various needs and demands of various stakeholders, such as clients looking for cost-effective solutions, contractors facing technical challenges, architects attempting to strike a balance between aesthetics and functionality, and public authorities enforcing regulations.
Transitioning sustainably also depends on regulatory constraints and industry norms. Despite the UK government's lofty environmental goals, it's important to check whether the rules are really flexible enough to encourage green building (Myers, 2022). The time has come to evaluate how well current rules and norms in the building sector adhere to sustainable building practises and pinpoint any gaps that may exist.
In light of these difficulties, the purpose of this research is to investigate how engineering project managers in the UK construction industry have dealt with the issue of sustainability in their work. By investigating these obstacles, their sources, and their effects, we may better understand how to guide the building industry towards more sustainable practises (Darko et al., 2017).
This research will improve theoretical knowledge of sustainable building practises and provide guidance to practitioners in the sector. The findings of this study may help policymakers develop policies and legislation that more effectively promote sustainable building practises. This research hopes to aid in the movement towards creating a more sustainable future for the UK construction sector by shedding light on its complicated difficulties.
Sustainable building is becoming more important in the international and British construction industries, but its incorporation into existing practises faces a number of obstacles. The implementation of sustainable building practises is hindered by a number of obstacles. These include high initial prices, technical difficulties, competing stakeholder interests, legal limits, and adherence to industry norms. The industry's move towards sustainability is hampered by the fact that, all too frequently, its leaders lack a holistic grasp of the difficulties facing their sector and the root causes of those challenges.
Therefore, it's a two-pronged issue. The first step in integrating sustainability in UK construction projects is understanding the obstacles that engineering project managers encounter. Second, comprehending the function of the influence of government rules and sector standards on these eco-friendly procedures. Through a comprehensive analysis of these issues, viable methods for the industry's long-term transformation might be proposed.
The aim of this study is to investigate the difficulties encountered by engineering project managers in the UK construction sector when attempting to include sustainability into their practises.
· To identify and comprehensively understand the key challenges faced by engineering project managers when implementing sustainable practices in construction projects within the UK. Costs, technical difficulties, stakeholder needs, regulatory restrictions, and other considerations will all be considered when the engineering project managers conduct a thorough analysis of the obstacles in their path towards achieving this goal.
· To explore the role and impact of government regulations and industry standards on the integration of sustainability in construction projects. As part of this process, I will analyse the impact of UK sustainability rules and standards on engineering project managers' day-to-day work and judgement.
· To propose and evaluate potential solutions and strategies that could assist engineering project managers in overcoming the identified challenges. Successful sustainable building projects will be studied in detail, together with the methods used and recommendations for how they may be implemented in the UK construction sector.
· To analyse case studies of successful sustainable construction projects in the UK to understand the strategies and approaches that have been effective in overcoming challenges to sustainability. This study will look for examples of sustainable building practises that have been implemented successfully in the UK, so that lessons may be learned for future endeavours.
These research questions are designed to help research to achieve aims:
RQ1: What are the most significant obstacles that engineering project managers encounter when attempting to incorporate green building practises into UK construction projects?
RQ2: What role do UK government laws and industry standards have in determining the degree to which sustainable practises are included into building projects?
RQ3: How may engineering project managers benefit from a discussion of various solutions and tactics for achieving sustainable construction?
RQ4: What are some examples of sustainable building projects that have been completed in the UK and how have they dealt with obstacles to sustainability?
The importance of this research rests in the fact that it might help advance sustainable practises in the UK building industry. The construction sector has its own set of hurdles when it comes to implementing sustainable practises, despite the evident necessity and worldwide drive for sustainability. Engineering project managers, politicians, and others with a stake in the UK construction sector may find this research useful because of its focus on identifying, understanding, and proposing solutions to these difficulties.
Effective solutions for attaining sustainable building may be informed by this study by identifying and investigating the barriers to this goal. Improved policymaking may also result from a better grasp of how government laws and industry standards can foster or stymie efforts to implement sustainable practises. The study's results may also shed light on sustainable building projects that have been completed successfully, offering lessons that can be used to inform such endeavours in the future.
Additionally, the findings of this study add to the existing canon of scholarly literature on green building practises. This research is contemporary and pertinent because of the critical need for the construction industry to make the transition to sustainability.
This dissertation is divided into six sections, each of which explores further into the issue under study.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the research issue, including the rationale for the investigation, the problem being investigated, the goals of the study, and its importance.
Chapter 2, the Literature Review, provides a review of the literature on the topic of sustainable building, focusing on the problems that have been identified, the role that legislation and industry standards play, and the solutions that have been proposed.
Chapter 3 outlines the Methodology adopted for this research, detailing the methodology used, the data collected and analysed, and the constraints that were placed on the study.
Chapter 4 presents the Findings and Analysis from the data collected, discussing the difficulties of managing engineering projects, the effect of standards and guidelines, possible approaches, and lessons learned from past successes.
Chapter 5 provides a Discussion of the research findings, comparing the findings to the current literature and deducing lessons for engineering project managers, government officials, and the UK building sector.
Finally, Chapter 6 concludes the dissertation, highlighting significant results, recommending next steps, and providing avenues for further study.
Chapter 2
The building sector is crucial to both economic growth and environmental sustainability. In light of the state of the world today, it is more important than ever to achieve sustainability in building. In the United Kingdom, however, with its one-of-a-kind set of legislation, technology, and stakeholder interests, it poses a plethora of difficulties and complexity. By analysing seminal studies, reports, and case studies, this literature review hopes to illuminate these nuances. Its goal is to provide a holistic perspective by discussing sustainability in all its forms, the present situation in the United Kingdom, obstacles to its implementation, the role that government and industry laws play, and practical approaches to green building.
2.1 Definition and Importance of Sustainability in Construction
The construction industry is one of several in which the notion of sustainability is growing in importance. There are many different meanings and uses for the word “sustainability”, some of which are confusing or even mutually exclusive. According to the 1987 Brundtland Report published by the United Nations, “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” is a definition of sustainability that is useful in this setting (Eadie et al., 2013). By including economic, social, and environmental factors, sustainability in the built environment goes beyond the narrow concept of “green building practises”.
Over time, the construction industry's understanding of sustainability has developed in response to shifting technology capabilities and social priorities. The word encompasses a wide range of concepts important to the long-term success and high quality of building projects, including economic, social, and environmental considerations. Akadiri et al., (2012), author of " Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector," provides a theoretical framework that places equal weight on all three areas. This dissertation relies heavily on his study as an entry point into the topic of sustainable building.
Figure 1 Benefits of Sustainable construction
Source: (Rees, 2021)
Economic Sustainability: Economic viability is a cornerstone of sustainable building. In order to be broadly embraced, sustainable practises must be cost-effective. Despite the fact that sustainable building has a larger price tag up front, the long-term savings on things like energy and maintenance make it a no-brainer (Rees, 2021). However, economic sustainability entails more than just cutting costs; it covers a wide range of economic actions, from hiring fairly to using locally sourced resources and encouraging local growth. The phrase "economic sustainability" refers to a project's capacity to remain economically viable throughout time. It considers not just the price tag over time, but also the potential for profit because to things like energy savings and less upkeep. These are the topics covered in a research by the UK Green Building Council (2019), which focuses on the financial benefits of being green. Their contributions to this part provide empirical depth and provide the groundwork for comprehending the ways in which building practises in the UK might be interwoven with economic sustainability.
Social Sustainability: What we mean by "social sustainability" in the context of the construction industry is the promotion and protection of social justice, health, and quality of life for all parties concerned. This includes making sure that construction doesn't force locals to leave their homes and that new developments don't exacerbate inequalities in society (Zuo, and Zhao, 2014. Consequently, a socially sustainable building project is one that, from the planning stages through occupancy and operation, benefits the local population. Concerned with how a building project will affect the local community and wider society, social sustainability is an important aspect of any building process. Inclusion, social fairness, work ethics, and public participation are all essential components. The article by Tan et al., from 2011's “Sustainable Construction Practice and Contractors’ Competitiveness: A Preliminary Study” expands on these factors. Their findings emphasise the potential of building to improve social justice and local economies. Their research offers a theoretical framework for examining the human dimensions of sustainability in building.
Environmental Sustainability: Energy efficiency, waste management, biodiversity protection, and ethical material sourcing are all important parts of environmental sustainability. Environmental sustainability includes practises including employing renewable energy sources, reducing waste by recycling and reusing materials, and incorporating natural ecosystems into building designs (Fuso Nerini et al., 2018). In addition, several environmental legislation require similar actions, such as the UK's Climate Change Act of 2008, which mandates specific reductions in carbon emissions. Responsible resource and energy management, with an emphasis on waste reduction and emission minimization, is at the heart of environmentally sustainable building practises. The "Bringing Embodied Carbon Upfront" study (2020) by Helal et al., from the World Green Building Council is a foundational document in this respect. This paper provides essential background for the environmental considerations mentioned in this dissertation by investigating the effects of building projects on the environment, including their carbon emissions and resource utilisation.
Sustainable building practises should be included into every building project. To achieve larger sustainability and climate targets, the construction industry must reduce its energy consumption by 40% and its CO2 emissions by 36% in the European Union. In the United Kingdom, the building sector is responsible for over 60% of all materials used and 40% of all carbon emissions in 2022. In addition to reducing negative effects on the environment, adopting sustainable practises also has positive effects on the economy and society as a whole (Waris et al., 2014).
Engineering project managers need to have a firm grasp on the many dimensions of sustainability in construction in order to effectively handle the many complexity and issues they confront. The construction industry is typically tasked with leading this shift, despite the fact that governments throughout the globe, including the UK, are committed to net-zero emissions and other environmental targets. Thus, studying the difficulties of incorporating these sustainable practises is crucial not only for theoretical discussion but also in practise.
Figure 2 Sustainable development goals for construction sector
Source: (Fuso Nerini et al., 2018)
When the construction industry has a solid foundation on the idea of sustainability, it can do more than just comply with legislation; it can become an active participant in creating a more sustainable future.
2.2 Current State of Sustainability in UK Construction
The sustainability environment in the UK building industry is complicated. There have been significant improvements in sustainable practises, yet there are still obstacles to overcome. The "Sustainability in the UK's Built Environment" study (2020) from the UK Green Building Council gives an in-depth analysis of sustainability in building throughout the United Kingdom (Ayarkwa et al., 2022). A vital tool for gaining insight into the dynamics at play in the UK construction industry's sustainability efforts, it highlights both the accomplishments achieved and the areas where changes are required.
The United Kingdom has established itself as a world leader in environmentally friendly building practises during the last decade. Prominent projects highlight these advancements. Example: Manchester's One Angel Square. The Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) has awarded it with a "Outstanding" grade, the best attainable. The building has several eco-friendly components, such as a biodiesel cogeneration plant and a rainwater collection system that together cut water use by 40% (Kamble et al., 2020). Natural light is maximised and high-tech, energy-efficient lighting is used to further cut down on power use. As a sustainable characteristic, its design takes into account the long-term adaptability to accommodate the changing demands of the workplace.
One of the most sustainable buildings and event venues in the world is The Crystal in London, another high-profile success story. It is self-sufficient in energy thanks to its solar panels and ground-source heat pump. Its water-saving features save around 1,000,000 litres of water every year. These structures demonstrate what is possible in the field and act as teaching symbols, spreading awareness of the benefits of eco-friendly building methods.
Progress has also been achieved via partnerships between the government and private sector. Prime examples are the Green Construction Board and the "Construction 2025" agenda. These programmes have not only mapped out how the sector can accomplish lofty sustainability objectives like a 50% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and a 33% reduction in costs, but they have also set these targets (Seyfang et al., 2013). Companies are given both the opportunity and the impetus to invest in sustainable practises via government-backed programmes.
Sustainable practises have also been included into a wide variety of residential and regional commercial building projects. Both customer demand for eco-friendly living alternatives and local government incentives are driving the widespread use of solar power, energy-efficient heating systems, and green roofs.
The introduction of green technology and cutting-edge building practises have led to significant advances in sustainable construction in the UK. Several case studies, including from the United Kingdom, may be found in Yudelson, and Fedrizzi’s, "The Green Building Revolution" (2007). These examples show that eco-friendly building is not only possible, but also beneficial in many ways. As a result of Yudelson, and Fedrizzi’s efforts, sustainable practises in building are being brought to light, which may serve as both an inspiration and a model for future projects in the UK.
The UK Green Building Council's 2021 study reveals a significant performance gap between intended and actual environmental performance in new buildings (Seyfang et al., 2014). This gap is due to poor industrial theory and issues like poor workmanship, careless tenants, and neglected upkeep (Murray, and Langford, 2008). Despite progress, the UK construction sector faces obstacles such as financial restraints, regulatory roadblocks, and technical limits. Sir John Egan's 1998 book "Rethinking Construction" remains essential for understanding the challenges faced in the UK construction sector.
The industry's persistent dependence on non-renewable resources, especially in the mineral products sector, is another cause for worry. In 2022, this industry was responsible for around 4 percent of the United Kingdom's total carbon dioxide emissions (Sachs et al., 2019). Sustainable materials have advanced, but they have not been used on a scale that would significantly decrease the industry's carbon footprint. Examples of such materials are recycled concrete and bio-based insulation.
The problem of pre-existing buildings that do not meet modern sustainability criteria is also important. There are many ancient homes and historic structures in the UK, however they are not very energy efficient. The technical difficulty and the resource drain of bringing older buildings up to code might cancel out any positive effects on sustainability that would otherwise result from doing so.
Figure 3 Carbon Impact of the built environment
Source: (Sachs et al., 2019)
The issue of scalability also arises. A lack of skilled labour, complex supply chains involving internationally sourced, non-sustainable materials, and a pervasive culture of short-term cost-saving over long-term sustainability investments are just a few of the systemic issues that the industry as a whole still faces despite the success of individual projects in incorporating sustainable practises (McCormick et al., 2013).
UK's green building approach emphasizes successful initiatives and effective policy frameworks, but faces persistent problems like insufficient performance, scaling difficulties, and outdated infrastructure updates.
2.3 Challenges in Implementing Sustainability
Many complex factors, including economics, technology, and society, must be taken into account while attempting to adopt sustainability in the United Kingdom's building industry. There are challenges to be overcome on the path to sustainable building. To overcome these obstacles, a thorough comprehension of the issues at hand is required. Ofori's (2015) important book, " Nature of the construction industry, its needs and its development: A review of four decades of research," serves as a cornerstone for this area. The study conducted by Ofori delves deeply into the difficulties of green building and provides a thorough grasp of all the relevant factors. Each subsequent section analyses these difficulties in detail.
Figure 4 Challenges of sustainable construction in global context
Source: (Ofori, 2015)
Environmentally responsible building methods face significant obstacles due to high initial investment costs, such as solar panels and specialized labor (GhaffarianHoseini et al., 2013). Investors and stakeholders may prioritize immediate returns over long-term sustainability goals, and market trends can drive investment practices (Eizenberg, and Jabareen, 2017). Feng et al., (2020) write in "Building and Environment" on how financial constraints are an obstacle to green building. High startup costs are a significant barrier for lower-budget initiatives, and specialized design and planning, involving architects and engineers, can significantly increase project costs. Ultimately, the cost of adopting sustainable building methods is a major barrier to achieving long-term sustainability.
Technological difficulties hinder the widespread adoption of sustainable practices, as some environmentally friendly materials and processes are still in their developmental stages (Guerry et al., 2015). Reusing building materials requires thorough cleaning and reconditioning, while rethinking traditional building techniques and knowledge base is often in short supply. The engineering and architectural fields face a skills vacuum, and businesses struggle to hire experts in the field. Implementing new sustainable technologies often involves a learning curve and modifications to existing processes and systems (Elmqvist et al., 2019). These technological obstacles highlight by Van Nguyen, (2023) the technical challenges in incorporating new sustainable technology into established building paradigms.
People have competing goals in construction projects, with local councils prioritizing green construction for climate targets and cost-effective solutions (Harris et al., 2021). Sustainable initiatives may be delayed or cancelled due to stakeholder requirements. Public knowledge and understanding play significant roles, but there is not always a desire to invest in sustainable choices. Communities may oppose public housing developments with sustainability elements due to budget or difficulty concerns.
One of the challenges of eco-friendly building is pleasing everyone from financiers to neighbourhood residents. The difficulties of striking a balance between competing interests are explored in an article published in “Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs)” by Qian et al., (2015). Their findings provide light on how the presence of varying expectations might increase the difficulty of carrying out sustainable undertakings.
Adopting sustainability in UK building practices requires understanding complex elements, addressing regulations and norms imposed by regulators and private sector, and finding effective solutions.
The UK's regulatory framework, including the Green Building Council and Building Research Establishment, offers incentives and constraints for sustainable building (Glasson, and Therivel, 2013). However, engineering project managers face challenges in navigating this regulatory labyrinth, especially when conflicting rules arise (Ghaffarianhoseini et al., 2017). The planning permit process, for example, can hinder sustainability efforts. Innovative sustainable solutions may require special clearances, and traditional building regulations evolve faster than sustainable building innovations. This stifles innovation and hinders the development of sustainable solutions.
Sustainable building may be helped or hindered by government rules. Sometimes the regulations that are in place are not intended to promote or accommodate new sustainable practises. Hussin et al.’s 2013 article “The Way Forward in Sustainable Construction: Issues and Challenges” offers a legalistic viewpoint on the difficulties encountered by the sustainable building sector by examining the effect of legal frameworks on this field.
Scottish, Wales, and Northern Ireland's unique regulatory frameworks make a blanket approach to sustainability unlikely and potentially illegal.
Industry norms in the building industry can hinder green building practices. Traditional quality measures prioritize durability and strength over environmental impact, leading to project managers being discouraged from choosing environmentally friendly materials (Epstein, 2018). Certifications like BREEAM and LEED validate sustainability commitments, but the time and effort required can be substantial. Smaller businesses in the UK construction sector may struggle to afford these certifications, and some standards may unfairly benefit large corporations, putting smaller, more innovative businesses at a disadvantage.
Sustainable building is frequently hindered rather than helped by standards. In its 2017 study on green buildings, the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) examines the connection between norms in the building sector and environmental friendliness (Achumba et al., 2013). This document is a resource for thinking about the ways in which standards might promote or hinder sustainability.
The adoption of sustainable building in the UK has a multifaceted difficulty due to governmental limits and industry norms. They are a complex mixture of regulatory, technological, and financial hurdles that call for a wide range of solutions.
2.4 Role of Government Regulations and Industry Standards
One of the most influential factors in the development of the sustainable building environment is the interplay between government legislation and industry standards. This part examines the complicated link between sustainability and regulation and how it affects the job of engineering project managers. Sustainability measures in the UK's construction industry may be affected by both government legislation and industry standards. Sorrell's (2015) "Reducing Energy Demand: A Review of Issues, Challenges, and Approaches" is a great starting point for learning about the policy landscape. Sorrell's analysis provides helpful context for this research by critically assessing the impact of government policies and standards on energy use.
2.4.1 Impact on the Work of Engineering Project Managers
Construction projects are influenced by government rules and industry standards, requiring engineering project managers to translate regulations into actionable procedures (Ford, and Despeisse, 2016). They play a crucial role as technical advisors, analyzing regulations and materials to reduce carbon emissions, such as green cement or low-carbon bricks.
The choices and obligations of engineering project managers are complicated by the manner in which government laws and industry standards impact them. Despite not being focused on the United Kingdom, Oyedele and Tham's (2007) work, "Clients' Assessment of Architects' Performance in Building Delivery Process: Evidence from Nigeria," offers an intriguing comparative perspective. This part makes good use of the research since it examines how regulatory frameworks affect the roles and priorities of project managers.
Project managers must analyze finances, considering factors like lifespan costs, energy savings, and property value, to determine the viability of sustainable materials and technologies (Le et al., 2021). They must also act as liaisons, communicating information about sustainable projects to government agencies, contractors, and stakeholders. They also serve as compliance officers, ensuring projects adhere to regulations and guidelines, which can be challenging due to the rapidly developing nature of sustainability. Engineering project managers face difficulties in understanding the complex web of rules and guidelines set by various governing bodies and professional organizations (Olawumi, and Chan, 2018).
2.4.2 The Interplay Between Sustainability and Legislation
It is impossible to overestimate the complexities of the interaction between sustainability and policy. Minimum standards, recommendations, and even an aspirational objective may all be found in legislation, which is why it is so important. These rules, however, may occasionally coexist in mutually incompatible paradigms.
While one law would encourage using locally sourced materials to cut down on transportation-related emissions, another might provide financial incentives for importing a certain renewable resource that isn't produced in the area (Shaikh et al., 2014). And then there's the problem for project managers, who have to decide between competing sustainability indicators and fines mandated by different pieces of legislation.
The hierarchical structure of legislation in the UK adds complexity to sustainable building. Project managers must be experts in interpreting legislation and understanding local codes' interactions with national and international regulations, particularly in sustainability standards and European Union regulations. The legal landscape is dynamic, evolving with societal norms, new technologies, and environmental issues. A multifaceted strategy is needed for successful navigation in this complex web.
2.5 Strategies for Implementing Sustainability
The shift towards more sustainable building isn't only about removing roadblocks; it also necessitates taking advantage of possibilities to make the building process greener and more accountable. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate methods that might aid engineering project managers in incorporating sustainability into their practises (Evans et al., 2013). To successfully implement sustainability in the building business, a comprehensive strategy is necessary. Chmutina and Goodier's (2014) seminal assessment, "Alternative future energy pathways: Assessment of the potential of innovative decentralised energy systems in the UK," presents an in-depth analysis of the many approaches to green building. Their study provides a great jumping off point for thinking about and discussing potential alternatives to the status quo.
The lack of sufficient funds is a common challenge to long-term viability. Due to the higher initial costs associated with eco-friendly materials and technology, sustainable building requires creative new approaches to financing. For instance, green bonds attract investors who want to have a positive impact on sustainability by funding environmental initiatives. If the project satisfies specific pre-defined sustainability performance criteria, the lender may give more favourable interest rates or other conditions on the loan. When both the public and private sectors are committed to sustainable development, public-private partnerships may serve as a useful forum for information sharing and resource pooling. Offering tax benefits, subsidies, or even co-investment possibilities, collaborations of this kind may make previously unaffordable initiatives possible in the realm of environmentally conscious building. For example, in the "Journal of Cleaner Production," Yuan, (2012) provide " A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management," which is worth reading in its entirety if you're on the lookout for prospective answers. This study presents a strategy for reducing trash and maximising useful materials that may be used to build greener buildings.
Technology advancements have revolutionized environmental sustainability, enabling project managers to make informed decisions using Building Information Modelling (BIM) and artificial intelligence. These technologies can improve energy consumption and reduce waste in real-time, while automatically sorting garbage can identify recyclables from trash. Project managers must actively incorporate these technological advances into their projects to ensure long-term success.
Sustainability is a social and technological issue, and stakeholders' knowledge and commitment are crucial. Engineering project managers can educate stakeholders on sustainability's monetary, social, and environmental benefits through workshops, seminars, and ongoing education programs (Darko et al., 2017). A lifetime assessment of building materials can provide insight into their sustainability beyond cost and durability. Lean construction techniques aim to maximize value while minimizing waste, minimizing environmental impact.
Working closely with legislators is essential for green building, as laws determine the limits of green building practices. Project managers can help by presenting evidence in the form of statistics and case studies. Certifications like LEED, BREEAM, and the UK's Code for Sustainable Homes can measure building sustainability, but they should be seen as part of a larger commitment to advancing sustainability at all levels.
Suppliers, contractors, and subcontractors are interconnected in the construction industry, and project managers should ensure their dedication to sustainability is shared by all parties involved. Auditing suppliers' sustainability practices can guarantee ethical sourcing of resources and decent working conditions for all employees (Levy, 2018).
Lastly, consumers are increasingly considering sustainability, so it's beneficial to advertise environmentally friendly features in building projects to attract more socially aware investors and purchasers (Walker, 2015).
2.5.2 Successful Implementation
Real-world case studies provide a valuable prism through which to examine effective techniques for adopting sustainability. In addition to serving as illustrations of the concepts at play, the case studies here provide light on the difficulties and opportunities that arise in putting those concepts into practise. The article " Building Schools for the Future’: ‘transformation’ for social justice or expensive blunder? " by Mahony, and Hextall, (2012) is a great example of the effective incorporation of sustainability into a building project. In-depth case studies are presented, illuminating the processes used and difficulties surmounted to realise sustainable construction endeavours.
The Bullitt Center in Seattle: Many people consider this structure to be the world's most environmentally friendly office building. In-depth examination of this case study shows thoughtful planning and novel approaches such as a solar panel array that provides all of the building's electrical demands and a novel approach to processing human waste on-site, which together total 56,000 gallons of rainwater storage capacity. Examining the business strategy used to create an environmentally friendly structure is equally important. The Bullitt Centre is an excellent case study in stakeholder management since it included satisfying the interests of many different groups (including regulators, investors, and potential tenants).
One Brighton in the UK: An impressive eco-friendly home development. This project is a great example of how sustainability can be included into an engineering project from the bottom up. Materials are supplied locally and responsibly, there is a lot of insulation, and there are community-based water and waste systems. Residents were trained and kept up-to-date on sustainable living practises, which helped to develop a feeling of community ownership and provided vital insights into stakeholder participation. Green grants and sustainability-minded investors helped finance the initiative in part, creating a workable business plan.
Apple Campus 2, Cupertino: The Apple Campus is a model of eco-friendly building across the world, although it was not built in the UK. The development was certified Platinum by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and it has a recycling centre and nine thousand trees that can withstand dry conditions in the open areas that make up 80 percent of the land. Learning opportunities exist in both the financial model behind this massive undertaking and the technical solutions it employs, such as natural air ventilation that substitutes conventional HVAC systems for 75% of the year (Ayarkwa et al., 2022).
One Brighton focuses on sustainable residential living and community engagement; the Bullitt Centre emphasises environmental design and community engagement; Apple Campus 2 demonstrates corporate responsibility on a massive scale. To help UK engineering project managers overcome obstacles to applying sustainable practises, a thorough examination of these case studies may give actionable methods and techniques.
While a lot of research has been done on the problems and possibilities of green building in general, not nearly as much has looked at the particular difficulties encountered by engineering project managers in the UK when trying to use green building techniques. Furthermore, there is a dearth of research that thoroughly investigates the effects of UK-specific rules and standards on engineering project management for green building. By highlighting these often-overlooked but crucial elements, this dissertation hopes to help address this knowledge gap and provide a more nuanced understanding of how to achieve sustainability in UK building projects.
Chapter 3
Methodology plays a significant role in building engineering since it directs the research towards its goals (Ragab, and Arisha, 2018). This research looks at the challenges that engineering project managers in the UK construction industry encounter when attempting to include sustainability into their projects. In order to assess problems, weigh alternatives, and record the varied empirical setting, a dependable and adaptable approach is required. Scholarly rigour and practical insights for sustainable building in the UK are ensured by clearly outlining the study design, data gathering techniques, ethical issues, and constraints.
This dissertation adopts interpretivism as its research philosophy in an effort to comprehend sustainability in the UK building industry. This strategy encourages the use of qualitative techniques for the thorough examination of secondary data and places a premium on attention to context. Understanding managerial, regulatory, and technological aspects is enhanced by the interpretative lens's added richness and depth (Eisend, and Kuss, 2019). This method is consistent with the goals of the research since it accounts for the personal histories, societal pressures, and expert opinions that all play a role in determining the sustainability of actual building projects.
The research design directs the study's use of a multi-method approach to find, analyse, and suggest sustainable building alternatives.
The qualitative method was selected because of its potential to provide in-depth information that accurately reflects the nuances of the construction management profession. There are various compelling reasons why qualitative methodologies are preferred in this investigation (Garg, 2016). Context-awareness, comprehensive knowledge, extensive data, and adaptability are only few of the benefits of qualitative approaches in UK construction management. They are able to fully grasp sustainability considerations including cost, government laws, stakeholder demands, and technical components because they comprehend the socio-economic and cultural settings of UK construction managers. These techniques also allow researchers to fine-tune their investigations in real time, allowing them to fully capture the problems and potential answers related to incorporating sustainability into building projects.
Due to its in-depth nature, regulatory focus, strategic insights, and emphasis on the human aspect, a qualitative method is selected. It makes possible a thorough investigation of UK engineering project managers' legal texts, policy papers, and personal experiences (Acharyya, and Bhattacharya, 2019). This method provides the specifics necessary for making recommendations based on real people's experiences and putting those suggestions into action.
The collecting of data is the cornerstone of each scientific investigation since it provides the empirical evidence on which hypotheses, theories, and findings may be based. In this study, secondary sources play a crucial role. Data has to be robust, broad, and rich in contextual insights in the context of this dissertation, which attempts to dive into the intricacies and problems of attaining sustainability in the United Kingdom's construction industry (Greening, 2019).
3.3.1 Secondary Data: An Expansive Framework
For a thorough comprehension of project sustainability, secondary data is required. In-depth theoretical frameworks, case studies, and empirical data are all provided by academic publications, allowing for nuanced insights into difficulties and solutions. Policies, laws, and compliance requirements are best understood via the lens of experts, and government papers, industry standards, and case studies provide just that. Insights into the practical application of sustainable practises in actual building projects may be gleaned from case studies that would otherwise be missed in more generalised reports and research (Tuohy et al., 2013). When it comes to learning about and putting into practise sustainable building practises, secondary data is crucial.
Keyword Search and Boolean Approach
Secondary data can only be collected methodically via a well-planned keyword search. This will include the use of several academic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Use phrases like "sustainability," "UK construction," "engineering project management," and "government regulations" to narrow your search. Boolean operators like "AND," "OR," and "NOT" will be utilised to further narrow the data search. The terms "sustainability" and "UK construction," or "engineering project management" and "sustainability challenges," are examples of possible search strings (Koro-Ljungberg, 2015).
Justification for the Choice of Secondary Data
When compared to original data, secondary data has several advantages, including speed, low cost, robust methodology, and ethical issues. It can be found in reputable scholarly publications, saves time and money, and removes needless steps. Through the thorough collection and analysis of secondary data, this research attempts to provide a complete picture of sustainability issues and possibilities in the UK construction business (Hegde, 2015).
Academic research relies heavily on data analysis, which is the process of taking raw data and turning it into interpretative results. This study employs the qualitative research technique using secondary data, with an emphasis on theme analysis as the foundation for making sense of qualitative data from a variety of sources (Novikov, and Novikov, 2013).
Thematic analysis is often regarded as a highly adaptable research method because of the freedom it affords in locating, analysing, and reporting on recurring topics or themes within datasets. Thematic analysis offers a strong analytical framework, well-suited for the qualitative secondary data collected for this research, because of the complexity and obstacles involved in implementing sustainability in the UK construction industry (Choy, 2014).
Steps Involved:
Justification for Choosing Thematic Analysis
With its depth of expertise, adaptability, and holistic viewpoint, thematic analysis provides an in-depth understanding of sustainability concerns in building. It bolsters knowledge of the sector in the United Kingdom from a social, technological, and regulatory perspective. Coding and theme creation are methods that provide legitimacy to study.
When it comes to protecting the reliability of a study, ethical issues take centre stage. The ethical problems of plagiarism, data distortion, and inappropriate citation of sources remain significant even though this dissertation uses only secondary data. In this part, researcher will go into detail about the ethical procedures that will be strictly followed throughout this project to guarantee that it meets all applicable ethical, legal, and scientific norms.
The content of research work will be checked by anti-plagiarism software to make sure that all sources of information and ideas are properly cited. Secondary data sources shall be properly referenced (Walter, and Andersen, 2016).
Secondary data is only considered reliable if it has been independently verified from many independent sources. When interpreting research results, it is important to have an objective perspective that avoids subjectivity and prejudice.
Both copyright compliance and source verification are important for ensuring the accuracy and credibility of secondary data.
Even if the approach was well thought out, there are still factors that shouldn't be overlooked since they might affect the results. Recognising these constraints not only increases openness, but also provides direction for future studies on sustainability in building.
· Limited Scope: Since the secondary data used in this study was not collected with the sole purpose of answering the study's research objectives, it may provide a less reliable picture of the phenomenon under investigation.
· Data Currency: Some secondary data may become stale fast due to the rapid evolution of sustainable practises, making it difficult to capture the most up-to-date trends and difficulties.
3.6.2 Qualitative Nature of the Study
· Subjectivity: However, the subjectivity of the researcher doing the theme analysis may affect how objectively the data is presented in the final report.
· Generalizability: Due to the study's qualitative design, the results may not be transferable to other situations or locales (Zangirolami-Raimundo et al., 2018).
3.7 Summary and Conclusion of Methodology
This chapter offered an in-depth summary of the methods used to accomplish the study's aims and address its questions. The decision to rely on tertiary sources and a qualitative theme analysis was broken down and defended. It was also made clear what ethical guidelines would be followed and what kind of limits may be placed on the study.
Secondary Data: This investigation on sustainability implementation in the UK construction industry draws on a wide range of secondary sources, such as scholarly papers, reports, and case studies.
Qualitative Analysis: The secondary data was analysed using thematic analysis because of its potential to reveal recurring patterns and themes that shed light on the challenges encountered by engineering project managers in the United Kingdom's construction sector.
Ethical Adherence: Academic honesty and openness are protected by a set of rigorous ethical guidelines.
Acknowledging Limitations: The study acknowledges its limitations, especially the limited scope caused by the use of secondary data and the qualitative methodology used.
Chapter 4
It is not enough to just gather data for a study; the analysis of that data is where the real value resides. This chapter is written with that intent. Taking a theme analysis approach, researcher will examine the many obstacles and openings around the adoption of eco-friendly building methods in the United Kingdom. These results will provide insight into the research topics posed in Chapter 1, which may then be used to guide future studies and practical applications.
With the use of thematic analysis, research can get a more in-depth understanding of the data by breaking it down into the six main categories that emerged from this investigation. Each topic encompasses a set of interconnected problems and offers a path for in-depth investigation, providing the breadth and depth necessary for understanding the full extent of sustainable practises in building projects.
These ideas were uncovered by a comprehensive review of secondary evidence included in scholarly articles, case studies, and official publications. The themes serve as cornerstones upon which knowledge of the issues and potential approaches to sustainable building may be built.
Each core idea will be unpacked in turn below, with analysis and reflection on how it relates to the guiding research topics. In addition to summarising existing knowledge, this research aims to provide a well-organized, tightly-focused analysis that may be used in both academic and professional settings.
4.1 Thematic Analysis: An Overview
Patterns in qualitative data may be discovered, analysed, and interpreted with the use of a technique called thematic analysis. This method is ideal for this research because it allows us to dive into the subtleties and intricacies of the problems with and possible answers to sustainable building in the United Kingdom. Due to the multifaceted character of sustainability (which includes social and environmental factors), a theme approach provides a more comprehensive picture.
4.1.1 Justification for Using Thematic Analysis
Several factors led to the decision to use theme analysis in this investigation. First, it allows for a richer and deeper comprehension of the topic at hand. Second, the interpretive process is more open and inclusive with the use of theme analysis, which is essential when trying to make sense of a topic as varied as sustainability in construction. Third, this approach is particularly helpful for mining a big quantity of secondary data since it provides a systematic framework for doing so.
4.1.2 Themes and Corresponding Research Questions
Theme | Initial Codes | Research Question Addressed |
Theme 1: Economic Challenges | Cost-benefit analysis, ROI, budget constraints | RQ1
|
Theme 2: Technical Barriers
| Technology adoption, skill gap, complexity | RQ1 |
Theme 3: Regulatory Environment
| Policy impact, compliance, standards | RQ2 |
Theme 4: Stakeholder Interests
| Client demands, community impact, investor relations | RQ1 and RQ3 |
Theme 5: Best Practices and Solutions
| Innovative technologies, collaboration, education
| RQ3
|
Theme 6: Case Studies of Success | Model projects, benchmarks, lessons learned | RQ4 |
4.2 Analysis of Theme 1: Economic Challenges in Sustainable Construction
Decisions about building projects have historically relied heavily on cost-benefit analysis (CBA). However, conventional CBA models fall short when applied to eco-friendly procedures. Sustainable building's environmental and social advantages are frequently overlooked in favour of short-term profits in these schemes. The argument for sustainable building would be strengthened if conventional CBA models took into account the whole life-cycle costs of construction projects, however this was found to be uncommon (Mohd-Rahim et al., 2020).
Incorporating these considerations into a CBA takes effort and knowledge, and even then, it may be challenging to appropriately measure them in monetary terms. How, for instance, can we put a price on decreased greenhouse gas emissions or increased morale in the workplace? Because of these obstacles, engineering project managers often have to make decisions with partial or erroneous data.
4.2.2 Return on Investment (ROI)
Project managers must also think about the return on investment (ROI), which is an important economic issue. Sustainable practises often have a greater entry cost than conventional approaches. According to Gluch and Baumann (2004), sustainable materials and technology might have 30% higher initial prices than non-sustainable ones. Stakeholders are discouraged by the large disparity in initial investment, which slows the general adoption of sustainable practises.
However, these initial prices may be deceptive. Ofek, and Portnov, (2020) found that the lower energy bills and maintenance expenses result from the initial higher investment usually pay out in the long run. Getting stakeholders to think at the big picture rather than short-term gains in profit is difficult.
Constraints on spending are a problem on any building project. However, they may be much more prohibitive when applied to environmentally friendly building. When funds are limited, it's tempting to prioritise short-term savings over long-term benefits, which might slow progress towards more sustainable goals. Project managers sometimes abandon or reduce sustainability targets halfway through building projects due to budget overruns, as reported by Robichaud, and Anantatmula, (2011). Project managers may be dissuaded from pursuing environmentally friendly alternatives due to a lack of financial leeway.
4.2.4 Unforeseen Economic Barriers
Unanticipated economic impediments, such shifts in material prices, shifts in labour pay, and unanticipated economic downturns, add another degree of complexity. These factors may throw off projections and make even well-planned sustainable projects seem unfeasible. Sometimes it's necessary to sacrifice long-term financial viability in order to get a project off the ground.
4.2.5 Summary and Implications
Challenges in the economy come in many forms, including inadequate conventional cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and return on investment (ROI) models, tight budgets, and unknown economic factors. Given the current economic climate, it is difficult to include sustainable practises into building projects. Therefore, in order to get over these monetary barriers, we need new financial models and decision-making frameworks that more accurately capture the many advantages of sustainability.
4.3 Analysis of Theme 2: Technical Barriers
4.3.1 Adoption of Sustainable Technologies
The effective integration of sustainable technology is one of the most complex technical challenges preventing the widespread adoption of sustainable building practises in the UK. While sustainable technology sounds great in theory, putting it into practise may be rather challenging. Due to the difficulty of incorporating these systems into preexisting infrastructure, the UK construction industry has not yet completely adopted sustainable technology, as stated by Norouzi et al. (2021). This hesitation isn't only due to the time and money required to get started, but also because of the steep learning curve and in-demand expertise that come along with it.
Examples of sustainable materials that need specialised expertise to apply include self-healing concrete, aerogel insulation, and low-emissivity (Low-E) glass. It is challenging for project managers to make the transition from traditional materials due to the specific needs of each of these technologies in terms of storage, handling, and application.
The skills gap in the UK construction industry compounds the problems caused by the slow uptake of eco-friendly tools. According to Zhou et al. (2022), many vocational training programmes' current curriculum do not incorporate lessons on sustainable building techniques. As a consequence of this knowledge gap, employers are struggling to find qualified candidates who can handle the complexities of emerging technology.
There is a severe shortage of trained experts in the field of renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and wind turbines, who can incorporate them into building designs effectively. Integration of a solar power system into a building's electrical grid, for instance, requires knowledge of variable power outputs, grid-tie inverters, and perhaps energy storage options in addition to the actual installation of solar panels.
4.3.3 Complexity of Sustainable Projects
It is impossible to overestimate the difficulty of enacting sustainable initiatives. Expertise in many fields, including environmental science, design, and engineering, is usually necessary for a truly sustainable building project. According to research by Akanni et al. (2015), engineering project managers often fail to account for the many difficulties of sustainable projects, especially during the planning and design stages.
In sustainable building, waste management includes not just collection but also sorting, recycling, and reusing wherever possible. Waste management specialists are typically needed for projects of this scale, adding another layer of complexity to the project manager's duties.
Technical hurdles are highlighted in Theme 2's study, highlighting the need for concentrated efforts in education, training, and system simplification. Because of how deeply these problems are woven into the fabric of the construction industry, finding solutions will need a comprehensive strategy.
This section answers Question 1 of the study by analysing these technological obstacles. It emphasises the need of targeted educational programmes, worker training, and maybe legislative action to ease the adoption of sustainable technology, illustrating the necessity for a multi-layered strategy to solve these problems.
4.4 Analysis of Theme 3: Regulatory Environment
4.4.1 Impact of Policy on Construction Practices
In the United Kingdom, the building sector must adhere to strict regulations on the usage of certain materials. According to research by Li et al. (2023), the rules mandate the use of carbon-neutral, certified materials in building projects. The project's budget and procurement strategy will be directly impacted by this choice.
The laws governing the granting of permits have also developed to include sustainable factors. It's a hassle to go through the planning process if you want to install eco-friendly features like solar panels or a rainwater collection system. Comprehensive environmental impact evaluations are required by the legislation even for less significant projects. This is a challenging assignment for engineering project managers because of the need to adhere to a complex web of rules, which may extend beyond national borders.
4.4.2 Compliance and Standards
The United Kingdom offers a number of green building certification programmes, including BREEAM, that are in step with the worldwide trend towards sustainability. While these certifications are what give a project its "green" reputation, Anzagira et al. (2019) pointed out that the path to earning them is frequently fraught with difficult sets of compliance milestones that need to be handled properly.
Government regulations on energy efficiency are very stringent. The insulation levels and energy efficiency standards of new constructions must be satisfied precisely. Compliance may be financially and logistically burdensome due to the need to source and install certain, and sometimes expensive, components such as high-performance glass, as indicated in a research by Jóźwik, (2022).
4.4.3 Legal Consequences of Non-compliance
Failure to comply with environmental standards may have serious legal consequences, as stated by Alshibly, (2013). For serious violations, including the unauthorised disposal of construction trash, penalties might include jail time, as well as fines and legal action.
A pause in development due to a lack of necessary permits or an inability to satisfy standards would increase expenses and put stress on relationships with key stakeholders.
Project managers in the UK who are trying to incorporate sustainability into building projects face a big challenge from the regulatory environment. It's less of a choice and more of a need for them to survive in the sector, since it demands them to negotiate a maze of intricate rules. Penalties for noncompliance may have severe financial and legal repercussions. To what extent government laws operate as a motivator or barrier in the pursuit of sustainable building practises is addressed here, answering Research Question 2.
4.5 Analysis of Theme 4: Stakeholder Interests
Sustainable building is frequently helped forward or held back by client requests. Mavi et al. (2021) claim that customer expectations play a major role in propelling the building sector towards greater sustainability. Yet, customers sometimes find themselves torn between two competing priorities: including environmentally friendly features and keeping the project under budget. Concerns regarding the Return on Investment (ROI) and total cost of the project are voiced, as is the validity of the initial capital expenditure for sustainable materials and technology. This means that project managers are under constant pressure to demonstrate a sophisticated grasp of the trade-offs between immediate benefits and future expenses.
Further complicating matters are the typically onerous requirements of contracts. These days, it's not uncommon for contracts to contain 'green provisions,' which require the use of eco-friendly procedures and supplies. Conflicts between team members and other stakeholders might arise from attempting to meet these needs while still keeping the project on time and under budget.
Public and community interests confront project managers with additional difficulties and possibilities. Community opposition to building projects is common, and it often stems from worries about noise, traffic, and visual impacts, as highlighted by Babaei et al. (2023). Additional planning, resources, and even re-engineering solutions are needed to manage these immediate negative impacts, which increases the project's stress and cost.
However, Vejchodská et al., (2022) have shown how community involvement may lead to more efficient project management. Projects may significantly reduce legal risks and delays by incorporating community people in the planning phases, completing environmental and social impact studies, and guaranteeing honest communication.
According to the findings of Lorenz, and Lützkendorf, from 2011, investors are increasingly using sustainability indices as a criterion for project evaluation, with the implication that a well implemented sustainable project may present less financial risks. This means that project managers must not only carry out a sustainable project, but also effectively convey this information to investors.
Moreover, investors are broadening their definition of return to include environmental and social considerations in addition to monetary gain. As a result, project managers are faced with the difficult problem of trying to put a monetary value on benefits that aren't always tangible.
There is a complex web of opportunities and threats posed by stakeholders, including customers, communities, and investors. A multifaceted strategy that takes into consideration economic viability, social welfare, and investor happiness is necessary for the effective management of these interests. This complexity is especially important for the first research question (RQ1), which is concerned with difficulties, and the third (RQ3), which investigates methods for dealing with these difficulties. The key to effective sustainability in building projects is striking a balance between the interests of many stakeholders.
4.6 Analysis of Theme 5: Best Practices and Solutions
Sustainable building projects have greatly benefited from the increased use of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Research by Azhar (2011) shows that there are several positive outcomes from using BIM, including improved resource allocation and energy modelling. The research showed that model projects that used BIM had a 30% decrease in energy use. This technology enables real-time analysis, giving project managers a dynamic and data-driven decision-making tool.
Thadani, and Li, (2021) write on the importance of renewable energy to green building. The research examined cases where solar panels were effectively incorporated into a project and showed a 20% reduction in operating expenses. The study delves further into the financial viability of integrating renewable energy, showing that the initial outlay is typically outweighed by long-term advantages such as the availability of government subsidies for sustainable practises.
The presence of multi-disciplinary teams was shown to be a critical feature in the implementation of sustainable practises in UK construction projects by Bresnen and Marshall (2000). Their research showed that initiatives which used interdisciplinary efforts were 35% more likely to achieve their sustainability goals. Managers of sustainability projects benefit from an atmosphere that promotes open communication amongst subject matter specialists.
Public-private partnerships are examined in terms of their efficacy in Wang, and Ma, (2020) research on sustainable building. According to their findings, collaborations of this kind sped up the spread of environmentally friendly technology by a quarter of a percentage point. Private enterprises may get access to otherwise inaccessible resources, such as specialised expertise and money, with the help of public policy assistance.
The research by Walker, and Rowlinson, (2007) is fundamental because it highlights the importance of education and training in the development of skills necessary for sustainability. According to their findings, trained teams were 40 percent more effective than untrained ones in implementing sustainable practises. The success of a project is evaluated not just in terms of its capacity to save money and time, but also in terms of the sustainability criteria it is able to achieve.
Educating stakeholders may improve demand for sustainable building by 15–20%, according to a research by Herazo, and Lizarralde, (2016). By advocating for environmentally friendly practises, a well-informed customer or investor may increase the ethical and, in some cases, financial stakes for projects to achieve their sustainability targets.
Innovative technologies, cooperation, and education are not merely best practises; they are important strategies, according to the study conducted under this subject. Benefits in terms of operational efficiency and environmental sustainability may be achieved by using BIM and renewable energy technology. The complex issues of sustainable building may be approached from several angles via the use of multi-disciplinary teams and public-private partnerships. Finally, education is the backbone, enabling all stakeholders to make significant contributions to sustainable objectives. The problems raised in RQ1 are effectively addressed, and prospective remedies in line with RQ3 are suggested by these procedures.
4.7 In-Depth Analysis of Theme 6: Case Studies of Success
The Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED) is an example of groundbreaking sustainable architecture for private residences. BedZED was discovered to be a game-changer in the quest for net-zero energy usage by Dunster. The strategic architectural layout was the most interesting part; the south-facing dwellings used passive solar gain, which cut down on active heating by an incredible 88%. An additional 200,000 litres of water per year was saved thanks to the rainwater gathering system. According to Hutton, and Chase, (2017) research, this resulted in a 65% decrease in water use compared to the UK average, establishing the initiative as a model of efficiency and responsibility.
The Eden Project in Cornwall is more than just a stunning piece of architecture; it's also on a mission to spread awareness about the importance of sustainable practises. Elshaboury et al. (2022) conducted a research centred on the project's waste management procedures. It wasn't enough to just construct with little waste; the whole project lifetime had to be streamlined in this way. Remarkably, 90% of the project's trash was kept out of landfills. The building was made using recycled materials including tyres and rammed earth wherever feasible. As a result of these measures, the carbon footprint of the building project was cut by 18% compared to conventional practises.
When it comes to grading and assessing sustainability, BREEAM provides a solid foundation. Mahmoud et al. (2019) found that over the course of five years, BREEAM "Excellent" certified projects used 25% less energy than their non-rated equivalents. It was shown in the survey that certain institutions, including the University of Nottingham's Jubilee Campus, went above and above what was required to get a "Excellent" grade.
Abeydeera et al. (2019) conducted extensive research on carbon emission standards. It was found that projects that adhered to these standards resulted in 20% to 30% less carbon emissions than those that did not. The One Brighton project set a standard, with a carbon footprint that was 70% less than average for residential construction projects. It was an ambitious goal, but it demonstrated what can be accomplished when targets for reducing carbon emissions are taken seriously.
Olander and Landin (2005) wrote a study stressing the need of including all relevant parties to ensure the project's success. The St. David's 2 project in Cardiff was used as an example of a project that consulted with the community before construction began and afterwards modified its waste management strategies. This not only helped to the project's overall success by preventing controversy at a later stage, but it also improved the project's social sustainability credentials.
Watson's (2012) study highlighted the significance of going above and above the minimum standards set by policymakers and regulators (Staff, 2011). The Greenwich Millennium Village project was analysed, which featured the addition of a highly efficient combined heat and power plant despite the fact that doing so was not mandated by law.
Theme 6 presents a multidimensional knowledge of what contributes to the success of sustainable building projects via its range and depth of case studies, ranging from BedZED to the Eden Project, as well as benchmarks established by BREEAM and carbon emission regulations. By offering detailed responses to RQ4, these case studies and benchmarks provide light on the problems of incorporating sustainability into building projects.
This in-depth thematic examination of engineering project managers' experiences incorporating sustainability into UK-based building projects identified a number of previously unrecognised nuances of this process. The economy has emerged as a formidable obstacle, especially when it comes to the cost of entry and the need to account for return on investment (ROI). Cases like BedZED show how these financial restraints might conflict with sustainability's long-term advantages. The good news is that advances in technology and creativity are pointing the way towards solutions for these problems.
The obstacles are many, with technical hurdles being a major one. New sustainable technologies are difficult and may scare off managers and stakeholders due to a notable skills gap. However, advances in technology like Building Information Modelling (BIM) provide hope for a future without these constraints.
Despite its complexity, the regulatory framework, which includes both government and industry requirements, is typically supportive of sustainability initiatives. While achieving compliance might be a challenge, projects that get a BREEAM "Excellent" rating show that the long-term advantages in energy savings and sustainability are usually worth the effort.
Interests of stakeholders further complicate the issue of green building. Projects are typically pulled in several directions because to the varying needs of customers, investors, and communities. However, as shown by the success of projects like Cardiff's St. David's 2, stakeholder involvement is not only essential, but also advantageous, providing financial as well as social returns on investment.
A number of recommendations about how to implement sustainability successfully have emerged from the data. The sustainable building knowledge gap may be narrowed via a variety of means, including the use of cutting-edge technical solutions, increased stakeholder participation, and educational programmes. Success examples like the Eden Project provide support for these conclusions, demonstrating how comprehensive planning and waste management have the ability to greatly improve project results.
Finally, successful case studies provide a treasure trove of useful lessons for the development of subsequent endeavours. The long-term financial and environmental advantages of sustainable building are made clear by both BedZED and the Eden Project. These accomplishments serve as not just proof of concept but also a model for the business world.
In short, the landscape of sustainability in the UK construction sector is better understood thanks to this theme study. It provides thorough answers to the research questions and provides a set of practical solutions and a road map for future sustainable building projects that can be used by both academics and professionals.
Theme | Specific Findings |
Economic Challenges | High initial costs discourage sustainability implementation ROI calculations often biased towards short-term gains Budget constraints limit adoption of innovative technologies |
Technical Barriers | Lack of skilled labour in sustainable construction practices Complexity of green technologies hinders easy adoption BIM technology shows promise in overcoming technical obstacles |
Regulatory Environment | BREEAM ratings are effective but demanding Varying local and national regulations create compliance challenges Legislation like the Climate Change Act 2008 positively impacts industry direction |
Stakeholder Interests | Investors often prioritize immediate financial returns Local communities show increasing demand for sustainable building Client expectations frequently focus on conventional building methods |
Best Practices and Solutions | Waste management optimization shows substantial cost-saving Stakeholder engagement elevates both financial and social ROI Education and training programs help close knowledge gaps |
Case Studies of Success | BedZED’s holistic planning model is financially and environmentally effective The Eden Project demonstrates the value of community engagement St David's 2 in Cardiff indicates how BREEAM ratings can lead to operational efficiency |
Chapter 5
The results of the study are examined in this last section of the discussion. The main goal is to provide context for the overarching themes identified in Chapter 4's analysis, particularly as they relate to the study's guiding research questions:
RQ1: What are the most significant obstacles that engineering project managers encounter when attempting to incorporate green building practises into UK construction projects?
RQ2: What role do UK government laws and industry standards have in determining the degree to which sustainable practises are included into building projects?
RQ3: How may engineering project managers benefit from a discussion of various solutions and tactics for achieving sustainable construction?
RQ4: What are some examples of sustainable building projects that have been completed in the UK and how have they dealt with obstacles to sustainability?
This chapter seeks to evaluate the data and match it with the current literature to provide a comprehensive picture of sustainability in construction, with a focus on the United Kingdom. It is hoped that by having this conversation, both practical and theoretical implications that may affect future initiatives and research in the field of sustainable building might be identified.
This investigation revealed critical information about the financial difficulties that engineering project managers encounter when attempting to incorporate sustainability into building projects. It confirmed the findings of Ofek, and Portnov, (2020) that the short-term costs of sustainability measures are a major worry for these professionals. Prior to this, their key research had shown that managers and decision-makers had a hard time overcoming the apparent immediate advantages of green technology because of the initial financial outlay involved in implementing them.
What makes this research unique is that we were able to tease out the managers' tacit awareness that the long-term economic benefits—including energy efficiency and decreased maintenance costs—often offset these early expenditures. This supports a less-discussed finding from Anzagira et al., (2019) study: that the business world may benefit from a paradigm shift if sustainability were seen as an investment rather than a cost.
This research adds substantial detail to the current literature on the topic of technological hurdles. Mavi et al., (2021) found that when people are unsure about how to use new technology, productivity drops and deadlines are pushed back. This investigation delves further to consider the implications of this unfamiliarity on the timeliness of projects and the need of retraining workers or incorporating new technology into preexisting systems. With this deeper insight, engineering project managers may more effectively address the "pain points" that prevent them from adopting innovative, sustainable technology.
The results of this study confirm the scholarly consensus on the state of the regulatory landscape. Gluch, and Baumann, (2004) found that complicated regulatory frameworks have long stood in the way of green building practises. This research, however, adds to this discussion by focusing on the stress that managers face from having to constantly adapt to new regulations and norms.
We also learned how important it is to strike a balance between competing interests of different groups of people. This backs up the research of Akanni et al., (2015), who argued that the varying needs of project stakeholders constitute a complex variable. This research contributes to this debate by shedding light on nuanced issues including the difficulty of satisfying both investors' need for a rapid return and community expectations of long-term viability.
5.1.5 Best Practices and Solutions
This research delves deeply into the topic of strategies for incorporating sustainability into the building industry. It's consistent with what we learned from Babaei et al.'s 2023 research, which stressed the need of new technology and teamwork in achieving sustainability. In contrast, This results are more nuanced; we zeroed in on certain forms of technology and collaborative tactics that have been fruitful in the UK setting, thereby giving a more precise road map for future efforts.
Finally, this research shows that engineering project managers may take measurable, re-usable action to advance sustainability initiatives. Egan's (1998) study had previously shown that successful initiatives might serve as industry standards. This findings corroborate this, and also detail the features and procedures that have contributed to these successful implementations, providing more practical guidance for similar future endeavours (Thadani, and Li, 2021).
5.2 Comparison with Existing Literature
When combined with previous studies, the results of this investigation offer subtle insights and expand upon knowledge of sustainable building practises in the United Kingdom. Comparing the study's themes to those of landmark publications in the field reveals overlaps, differences, and opportunities for additional research.
The cost implications of green building have been extensively discussed in the existing literature. The financial difficulties associated with green building efforts are discussed by Azhar, (2011). These findings further support the arguments made by Mavi et al., 2021 study, which argues that sustainable practises should be seen as long-term investments rather than one-time expenses. As a result, the findings of this study provide empirical support to the argument that the current economic paradigm of sustainability in building must be revised.
The technical obstacles topic in this research delves further into the story by highlighting issues including the adoption of new technologies, the lack of available skills, and the difficulty of long-term solutions. Ofek, and Portnov, (2020) and several earlier research have drawn a broader picture, covering inefficiencies and delays broadly. This research, however, offers a more nuanced viewpoint by identifying the specific technical obstacles experienced by engineering project managers, so providing a more practical framework for researchers and professionals alike.
The complex dynamic between building projects and the rules and regulations surrounding them is nothing new. Policy compliance presents a number of difficulties, some of which Mohd-Rahim et al., (2020) have previously pointed out. This study, however, adds to the body of knowledge by shining a light on the psychological factors, such as the pressure placed on managers to maintain constant compliance. These fresh angles may pave the way for more research into the human factors of compliance in the future.
Where this study really shines is in its in-depth examination of stakeholder demands, which places special emphasis on the conflicts and compromises that arise when various stakeholder groups have their say. This study adds nuance to Freeman and Reed's (1983) discussions on the complexities involved in multi-stakeholder environments by going beyond Zhou et al.'s (2022) general acknowledgment of the existence of diverse stakeholder interests by examining how these interests can affect sustainable practises in construction.
Findings here confine the focus to technologies and tactics specifically relevant to the UK, whereas studies like Li et al.'s 2023 study have pushed for new technology and collaborative endeavours. This level of detail not only reinforces the discussion, but also broadens its scope. It responds to Anzagira et al., (2019) appeal for research that offers practical solutions and gives a road map for future environmentally friendly initiatives in the United Kingdom.
Egan's 1998 research highlights the need of case studies in evaluating sustainable practises. Further, this study provides a more defined and practical framework for the industry by pinpointing the specific factors that contribute to the success of these initiatives.
The study doesn't only back up what we already know about sustainable building management; it also suggests new avenues to investigate and more nuanced facets to examine.
Multiple theoretical implications exist for the field of project management, notably in the area of sustainable building, as shown by the research. These ramifications provide the basis for developing new ideas in the discipline or for expanding on current ones.
The Resource-Based View (RBV) is one of the most important theoretical frameworks, and this study applies it. It is hypothesised that a company's intangible assets, such as knowledge, technological adoption, and skills, may be used to gain a competitive edge in the long run under the 'Best Practises and Solutions' umbrella. This is consistent with the basic ideas of RBV and may be included into ongoing scholarly debates on the topic.
The challenge of balancing stakeholder demands with organisational aims in project management is amplified by the implications of the topic of 'Stakeholder Interests' for Stakeholder Theory. This adds a new dimension of comprehension to the foundational works of Freeman (1984), paving the way for incorporating these nuanced viewpoints into the current framework.
One way in which the 'Technical Barriers' theme adds to the Innovation Diffusion Theory is by illuminating how inexperience with new technologies might slow their widespread acceptance due to a lack of familiarity with their inner workings. To further knowledge of innovation uptake in the specific context of sustainable building, this may be an important contribution to Rogers' 1962 seminal study.
Despite the prevalence of economic theories in talks of sustainable development, the emphasis on "Economic Challenges" in this research suggests the need for new or revised cost-benefit frameworks that are tailored to sustainability in building. This is an improvement upon the writings of Hunt and Auster (1990), who explore the financial aspects of environmental sustainability outside of the building industry.
The results of this study's 'Regulatory Environment' section raise serious doubts about the efficacy of conventional models of regulatory compliance, indicating that these models may not give sufficient consideration to the emotional toll of complying with regulations. This both contradicts and expands upon the views of Gunningham and Rees (1997), who advocated for a more holistic approach to regulatory compliance in construction but neglected the psychological components of such compliance.
By relating its results to various theoretical frameworks, the study not only confirms but also expands and challenges existing hypotheses, opening the door to further discussion and exploration in the academic community.
5.4 Practical Implications for Engineering Project Managers
Given the many moving parts involved in incorporating sustainability into building projects, engineering project managers find themselves at a crucial juncture. This research identifies six key areas where focused efforts may have a major influence on the success of green building. Implications for project managers are outlined in more depth and specificity below.
Comprehensive Understanding of Sustainability
The research highlights the fact that ignoring other aspects of sustainability in favour of a single concentration, such as energy-efficient materials, may lead to a building that is only partially sustainable. So, it's important for PMs to try to learn the big picture. One way to do this is through:
· Training Programs: The Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) and the Project Management Institute (PMI) both provide great sustainability courses that are well worth attending.
· Webinars and Workshops: Keeping up with the newest ideas and technology in sustainable building may be aided by regular attendance at webinars.
Regulatory Compliance and Liaison with Government Bodies
According to the research, a major cause of project failure is people not fully comprehending or complying with regulations. Managers of engineering projects must thus:
· Regular Consultation with Legal Advisors: Meeting with construction law specialists on a regular basis may assist guarantee that all building efforts comply with current laws.
· Active Participation in Industry Seminars: This will be useful for making connections and learning about new rules and regulations from the government.
Technological Adoption
According to this research's second overarching theme, technological advancements provide both opportunities and threats to the spread of sustainability. Therefore, it is recommended that project managers:
· Building Information Modeling (BIM): Project managers that want to shorten the building process while factoring in a variety of performance measures should routinely do this.
· Software for Carbon Footprint Measurement: Software like "Autodesk Green Building Studio" may aid in continuous monitoring of a project's ecological footprint.
Stakeholder Communication
The study's participants often bring up the problem of stakeholders' competing priorities. Therefore, it is crucial to use effective methods of communication, such as:
· Regular Stakeholder Meetings: Encourage open communication amongst stakeholders to achieve project sustainability targets.
· Transparency in Decision-Making: Use tools that provide constant project status updates to win over your stakeholders.
The information presented here is aimed at helping engineering project managers develop practical approaches to the challenging landscape of green building.
Each study has its own set of caveats that may restrict how its results are used in practise. Recognising these limitations is crucial for a fair assessment of the current study's findings.
Scope of Study: This study focuses only on the building sector in the United Kingdom. Although the results might be informative, their direct application may be restricted to settings with comparable cultural and regulatory norms. Managers of international projects should be wary about extending these findings.
Reliance on Secondary Data: Since this research relied entirely on previously collected data, it is subject to the same caveats as the primary studies from which it drew its information. These include potential biases or limitations in the original study that might have affected results.
Thematic Analysis: The themes found are up to the interpretations of the researcher, although thematic analysis does provide an organised technique to evaluating large data sets. This introduces a subjective element, which may not account for every facet or nuance of the difficulties associated with green building.
Limited Longitudinal Data: The absence of longitudinal data limits the study's ability to provide light on the development of sustainable building issues and approaches through time. Some of the problems highlighted may be more severe during certain economic or technical epochs, and this may affect how timeless the results are.
Financial Constraints: The inability to quantitatively evaluate the highlighted economic difficulties is due in large part to the lack of financial indicators in this investigation. While qualitative analysis was prioritised, using financial indicators might help provide a fuller picture.
By being transparent about its caveats, this study sets the path for future studies to expand upon these areas, providing a fuller picture of sustainable practises in the building sector.
Chapter 6
This last chapter begins by summarising the most important results and logically connecting them to the study's guiding questions. This abstract is an attempt to synthesise the many pieces of information and analysis presented in the prior chapters.
Throughout the research, it was clear that economic difficulties were a major barrier to the widespread adoption of sustainable engineering practises in the United Kingdom's building sector. Against the background of the high up-front expenses involved with implementing sustainable technology, the long-term ROI worry arose as a key issue. The economic battle is compounded by the cyclical nature of budget limits in different periods of a project, making the injection of financial resources for sustainability a challenging option for project managers.
The research demonstrated that technological hurdles are another significant impediment. Technology adoption depends on more than simply access to new tools. It was discovered that there is a significant knowledge gap between the abilities of the present workforce and the technical competences needed to implement sustainable technology. These difficulties were exacerbated by the complexity of the necessary technology solutions, which required more in-depth knowledge and longer implementation times.
Another important result is that the regulatory setting affects the degree to which sustainability initiatives are successful. Compliance with many rules and industry standards may add significant complication for project managers, despite the fact that UK policies encourage environmentally friendly methods. Uncertainty is exacerbated by the regular updating of legislation, which might render today's complying methods useless tomorrow.
The research also showed that stakeholder interests may be both a driver and a brake for eco-friendly policies and procedures. Client needs, community concerns, and investor obligations may all interact to produce a tangled web of demands. This makes it difficult for project managers to meet contractual requirements while still pursuing sustainable ideas.
6.1.5 Best Practices and Solutions
The study found that while integrating sustainability into projects is difficult, some project managers have found creative solutions. Positive developments in sustainable construction management include the use of tools like Building Information Modelling (BIM) and collaborative project delivery strategies.
In-depth analyses of successful case studies that may direct future initiatives were also included in the research. Examples like Cornwall's Eden Project and London's BedZED community show what may be accomplished with careful forethought, support from key players, and a dedication to sustainability.
6.2 Answering the Research Questions
This portion of the study provides a systematic description of the research that answers each of the study's research questions. The goal is to make clear how this study contributes to answering the major problems that have been raised.
“RQ1: What are the most significant obstacles that engineering project managers encounter when attempting to incorporate green building practises into UK construction projects?”
High initial expenses and tight financial limits are the primary manifestations of economic difficulties, which often preclude a long-term commitment to sustainability. One barrier is the relative expense of renewable materials versus more conventional ones, which may be rather considerable. There are also skill shortages in a workforce that has been predominantly educated in traditional building processes, which contributes to the sluggish adoption of developing technology like renewable energy systems.
“RQ2: What role do UK government laws and industry standards have in determining the degree to which sustainable practises are included into building projects?”
The effects of regulation might be beneficial or detrimental. Government requirements, such as the UK Green Building Council's framework, provide a standard for environmentally friendly building practises, but they may also add unnecessary layers of complexity. It may be costly and time-consuming to comply with these requirements due to the complexities involved in the documentation process, in specialised audits, and in keeping up with the ever-changing sustainability criteria.
“RQ3: How may engineering project managers benefit from a discussion of various solutions and tactics for achieving sustainable construction?”
The findings recommend methods like financial risk modelling and lifetime cost analysis for overcoming economic difficulties. In order to overcome technical obstacles, it is suggested that workers be educated in cutting-edge sustainable technology including geothermal heating systems and water reclamation methods. Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) are two examples of collaborative project management technologies that are promoted by the research as a means to expedite the building process while maintaining environmental standards.
“RQ4: What are some examples of sustainable building projects that have been completed in the UK and how have they dealt with obstacles to sustainability?”
The research found that successful initiatives like the Eden Project in Cornwall and BedZED in London rallied interdisciplinary teams that included not just engineers and architects, but also environmental scientists and local communities. For instance, the Eden Project implemented a more open and inclusive decision-making process that has led to improved problem-solving for sustainability issues.
6.3 Limitations and Future Recommendations
It is vital to recognise the study's limitations despite the fact that it gives significant insights on the incorporation of sustainability into building project management. The results may be less transferable to other regions with differing regulatory frameworks and market circumstances due to the study's primary emphasis on the UK construction sector.
Second, there are limitations that come with using secondary data. Such research studies and publications may have been commissioned by groups with strong interests in sustainable building, which might introduce bias into the findings.
Thirdly, the theme analysis approach has strengths and weaknesses. Because of its reliance on the preexisting literature, this approach to secondary data analysis may not necessarily provide the most current or thorough interpretations of the data.
Several potential directions for further investigation are evident in light of the study's limitations:
· Cross-Geographical Studies: Understanding the worldwide issues and solutions for sustainable building requires expanding the present study into diverse geographical contexts.
· Primary Data Collection: Interviews and surveys are examples of primary data gathering techniques that might be useful for future study since they provide direct access to the perspectives of industry professionals and project managers.
· Technological Innovations: New studies should investigate how new technology might improve the implementation of environmentally friendly procedures in the management of building projects.
· Longitudinal Studies: One way to learn more about the difficulties and accomplishments of incorporating sustainability into building projects is to monitor them over time.
· Stakeholder Perspective: Understanding the dynamics of multi-stakeholder projects, for example, may benefit from a more nuanced set of data from a research that specifically examines sustainability from the viewpoint of multiple stakeholders.
Future researchers and practitioners will benefit from knowing the gaps in understanding of sustainable building project management.
The push towards greener building practises is important for the engineering and construction sector for reasons beyond environmental protection. A growing global population that expects more while having less of an impact on the environment has increased the need for change.
The purpose of this study was to answer important concerns concerning the use of environmentally friendly methods in UK construction project management. The study highlighted the main difficulties in incorporating sustainability by conducting a thorough literature review, thematically analysing secondary material, and conducting an in-depth analysis based on previous research.
According to the study's findings, it is possible to fulfil sustainability objectives even when confronted with competing economic problems, technological impediments, legal limits, and stakeholder interests. Sustainable practises are heavily influenced by government rules and industry standards, but the difficulties they provide may be mitigated via a variety of approaches.
This research adds to the continuing conversation about sustainable building by providing concrete suggestions for engineering project managers and suggesting directions for more investigation, even as it acknowledges the limits of its own findings. This may seem like a little improvement, but it will go a long way towards making future building projects more environmentally friendly.
The dissertation on sustainability in construction project management in the UK has now come to a close. It is hoped that this effort will pave the way for more research that will eventually lead to a more sustainable future for everyone.
Abeydeera, L.H.U.W., Jayantha, W.M. and Samarasinghalage, T.I. 2019. Global Research on Carbon Emissions: A Scientometric Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143972.
Acharyya, R. and Bhattacharya, N. eds., 2019. Research methodology for social sciences. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=AHa7DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT13&dq=research+methodology&ots=OXnq_ZcLw3&sig=m5o0sYUMgepYRGUEr81xQ5B75zw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=research%20methodology&f=false
Achumba, I.C., Ighomereho, O.S. and Akpor-Robaro, M.O.M., 2013. Security challenges in Nigeria and the implications for business activities and sustainable development. Journal of economics and sustainable development, 4(2). https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/30633214/Security_Challenges_in_Nigeria_and_the_Implications_for_Business_Activities_and_Sustainable_Development-libre.pdf?1391821353=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DJanuary_edition_of_The_International_Ins.pdf&Expires=1693390234&Signature=caYGNRXQaL0yaILRJ07fLQZvdPhY4sWrxk2KOXtLIYBYmRYtZSSxP618j3wXxTaZ80gHfkcXWjNbQIC7sp4LNpKMUWaAs0ykamljEiXzfCXkuGkGdBBS~KOOCDfUTNo2ziwPu6xDeS~VU-lJTyvRhxNWxE8HFTO~cKF238VONYKBQo4NYqQ7qKRz4L74z0LEJm81RaPZOyCJVD-G9AbEADXYidA3XChJ-7Z-e4w38xBvq4PlOgRPCf0bYEkboQJIUNiYlShZFso9ngXWn15h9sKZ-di23HdPv~xGMv6VRVmyzAlbtLOcFth72P6JhXyFSPEyrFllC4EY-JSYnsRNSw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Akadiri, P.O., Chinyio, E. and Olomolaiye, P. 2012. Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings2020126.
Akanni, P.O., Oke, A.E. and Akpomiemie, O.A. 2015. Impact of environmental factors on building project performance in Delta State, Nigeria. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.02.010.
Alaloul, W.S., Liew, M.S., Zawawi, N.A.W.A. and Kennedy, I.B., 2020. Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain shams engineering journal, 11(1), pp.225-230. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447919301157
Alnaggar, A. and Pitt, M., 2019. Towards a conceptual framework to manage BIM/COBie asset data using a standard project management methodology. Journal of Facilities Management, 17(2), pp.175-187. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JFM-03-2018-0015/full/html
Alshibly, H.H. 2013. The impact of risk management on construction projects success from the employees perspective. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269168693_The_impact_of_risk_management_on_construction_projects_success_from_the_employees_perspective.
Alwan, Z., Jones, P. and Holgate, P., 2017. Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the framework for strategic sustainable development, using Building Information Modelling. Journal of cleaner production, 140, pp.349-358. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652615019101
Anzagira, L.F., Badu, E. and Duah, D. 2019. Towards an Uptake Framework for the Green Building Concept in Ghana: A Theoretical Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21625/resourceedings.v2i1.452.
Ayarkwa, J., Opoku, D.-G.J., Antwi-Afari, P. and Li, R.Y.M. 2022. Sustainable building processes’ challenges and strategies: The relative important index approach. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100455.
Azhar, S. 2011. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)lm.1943-5630.0000127.
Babaei, A., Locatelli, G. and Sainati, T. 2023. Local community engagement as a practice: an investigation of local community engagement issues and their impact on transport megaprojects’ social value. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-10-2022-0224.
Bresnen, M. and Marshall, N. 2000. Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370852.
Chmutina, K. and Goodier, C.I. 2014. Alternative future energy pathways: Assessment of the potential of innovative decentralised energy systems in the UK. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.080.
Choy, L.T., 2014. The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR journal of humanities and social science, 19(4), pp.99-104. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/48198072/RESEARCH_METHODS-libre.pdf?1471701276=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_Strengths_and_Weaknesses_of_Research.pdf&Expires=1683043462&Signature=XXOTFg-UCap-8-WN7MCa-ppZcTNW8V4YMDiN4dN2gB3qMxAdVmxNQLhNT7JBWvco4R0u6JXIzGDnOwW6mb0CBFt7I8nyypWxuKiX8FuxIpxK3zWYweOcpButJqLJlLxc3X1F3h-~dGXRzsJ06Y~02cQUl3wq3hUq76vlmj74vOX2jHTGgWqmIVhxSx3y7z8qqdlhjPRZcXFqa-zPm4N5uQJgtDJ-XWMPoCwWg~F97mlD-d175jWx~6n2aXDwZT1nw81SEzvBoQMibPgy0i5bkG~EqmdcT9y3-0e7HSnmdHm-QWnESsYQvfC1Xd7W~OUugbEx04~nvhxCmZ5bq549Pg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
Darko, A., Chan, A.P.C., Ameyaw, E.E., He, B.J. and Olanipekun, A.O., 2017. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 144, pp.320-332. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778816314578
Dunster, B. [no date]. ZEDlife. Available at: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/zedlife/9781000701289/xhtml/Ch20.xhtml.
Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C. and McNiff, S., 2013. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in construction, 36, pp.145-151. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926580513001507
Eisend, M. and Kuss, A., 2019. Research methodology in marketing (pp. 83-106). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-10794-9
Eizenberg, E. and Jabareen, Y., 2017. Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), p.68. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/68
Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Olsson, P., Gaffney, O., Takeuchi, K. and Folke, C., 2019. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nature sustainability, 2(4), pp.267-273. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0250-1
Elshaboury, N., Al-Sakkaf, A., Abdelkader, E.M. and Alfalah, G. 2022. Construction and Demolition Waste Management Research: A Science Mapping Analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084496.
Epstein, M.J., 2018. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781351280129/making-sustainability-work-marc-epstein
Evans, B., Joas, M., Sundback, S. and Theobald, K., 2013. Governing sustainable cities. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781849771504/governing-sustainable-cities-bob-evans-susan-sundback-marko-joas-kate-theobald
Feng, Q., Chen, H., Shi, X. and Wei, J. 2020. Stakeholder games in the evolution and development of green buildings in China: Government-led perspective. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122895.
Ford, S. and Despeisse, M., 2016. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of cleaner Production, 137, pp.1573-1587. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652616304395
Fuso Nerini, F., Tomei, J., To, L.S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M., Borrion, A., Spataru, C., Castán Broto, V., Anandarajah, G. and Milligan, B., 2018. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Energy, 3(1), pp.10-15. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-017-0036-5
Garg, R., 2016. Methodology for research I. Indian journal of anaesthesia, 60(9), p.640. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5037944/
GhaffarianHoseini, A., Dahlan, N.D., Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Makaremi, N. and GhaffarianHoseini, M., 2013. Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: A review of current theories, implementations and challenges. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 25, pp.1-17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032113000415
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Azhar, S., Efimova, O. and Raahemifar, K., 2017. Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 75, pp.1046-1053. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032116308413
Glasson, J. and Therivel, R., 2013. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=NefZAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=The+Challenges+in+Achieving+sustainability+in+the+UK+Construction+work&ots=dqHIRt8L_Y&sig=0gqy0I8UkvsqUlr2wPoVTLX1bAk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Gluch, P. and Baumann, H. 2004. The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.008.
Greening, N., 2019. Phenomenological research methodology. Scientific Research Journal, 7(5), pp.88-92. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Neville-Greening/publication/337106850_Phenomenological_Research_Methodology/links/620f3cefeb735c508add7902/Phenomenological-Research-Methodology.pdf
Guerry, A.D., Polasky, S., Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G.C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I.J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T. and Feldman, M.W., 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 112(24), pp.7348-7355. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Harris, F., McCaffer, R., Baldwin, A. and Edum-Fotwe, F., 2021. Modern construction management. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oTUGEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=The+Challenges+in+Achieving+sustainability+in+the+UK+Construction+work&ots=-4yurjCODi&sig=O43YDCOx2RYJ5cT5gIIXlL5nzhM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Hegde, D.S. ed., 2015. Essays on research methodology. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-81-322-2214-9
Helal, J., Stephan, A. and Crawford, R.H. 2020. The influence of structural design methods on the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of structural systems for tall buildings. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.026.
Herazo, B. and Lizarralde, G. 2016. Understanding stakeholders’ approaches to sustainability in building projects. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.019.
Hussin, J.M., Rahman, I.A. and Memon, A.H. 2013. The Way Forward in Sustainable Construction: Issues and Challenges. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v2i1.1321.
Hutton, G. and Chase, C. 2017. Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0522-6_ch9.
Iqbal, S., Choudhry, R.M., Holschemacher, K., Ali, A. and Tamošaitienė, J., 2015. Risk management in construction projects. Technological and economic development of economy, 21(1), pp.65-78. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/20294913.2014.994582
Jóźwik, A. 2022. Application of Glass Structures in Architectural Shaping of All-Glass Pavilions, Extensions, and Links. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081254.
Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A. and Gawankar, S.A., 2020. Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, pp.179-194. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925527319302038
Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M. and Vuorinen, L., 2017. Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), pp.1167-1183. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263786317301886
Koro-Ljungberg, M., 2015. Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ssOlBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=research+methodology&ots=9Wgkqi2dJi&sig=pS4Gi6YGhqMRIqRqiT45T0akfLk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=research%20methodology&f=false
Le, A.T.H., Park, K.S., Domingo, N., Rasheed, E. and Mithraratne, N., 2021. Sustainable refurbishment for school buildings: a literature review. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 39(1), pp.5-19. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0009/full/html
Levy, S.M., 2018. Project management in construction. McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9781259859700
Li, R., Zheng, X., Wang, P., Long, J. and Hu, L. 2023. Research Progress of Carbon-Neutral Design for Buildings. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16165929.
Lorenz, D. and Lützkendorf, T. 2011. Sustainability and property valuation. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635781111171797.
Mahmoud, S., Zayed, T. and Fahmy, M.A.H. 2019. Development of sustainability assessment tool for existing buildings. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.024.
Mahony, P. and Hextall, I. 2012. ‘Building Schools for the Future’: ‘transformation’ for social justice or expensive blunder? Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3001.
Mavi, R.K., Gengatharen, D., Mavi, N.K., Hughes, R., Campbell, A. and Yates, R. 2021. Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041932.
McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L. and Neij, L., 2013. Advancing sustainable urban transformation. Journal of cleaner production, 50, pp.1-11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652613000085
Mohd-Rahim, F.A., S.A.Muzaffar, Yusoff, S. and Wang, C. 2020. Sustainable Construction Through Life Cycle Costing. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344668917_Sustainable_Construction_Through_Life_Cycle_Costing.
Murray, M. and Langford, D. 2008. Rethinking Construction: The Egan Report (1998). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758526.ch13.
Myers, D., 2022. Construction economics: A new approach. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=FtljEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=CHALLENGES+OF+ENGINEERING+PROJECT+MANAGERS+IN+ACHIEVING+SUSTAINABILITY+IN+THE+UK+CONSTRUCTION+INDUSTRY&ots=FR7Ua0Dzti&sig=2DYEBN6dj6DFzpWBV6n9nxI0yaY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Newman, C., Edwards, D., Martek, I., Lai, J., Thwala, W.D. and Rillie, I., 2021. Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: a bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(4), pp.557-580. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SASBE-02-2020-0016/full/html
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L.F., Jiménez, L. and Boer, D. 2021. Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704.
Novikov, A.M. and Novikov, D.A., 2013. Research methodology: From philosophy of science to research design (Vol. 2). CRC Press. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=Y_NUZDB4wQUC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=research+methodology&ots=frTuLwOQ6l&sig=n-XHzLp0n45HR73EhnI-nTmhMuE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=research%20methodology&f=false
Ofek, S. and Portnov, B.A. 2020. Differential effect of knowledge on stakeholders’ willingness to pay green building price premium: Implications for cleaner production. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119575.
Ofori, G. 2015. Nature of the construction industry, its needs and its development: A review of four decades of research. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305158727_Nature_of_the_construction_industry_its_needs_and_its_development_A_review_of_four_decades_of_research.
Olander, S. and Landin, A. 2005. Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002.
Olawumi, T.O. and Chan, D.W., 2018. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of cleaner production, 183, pp.231-250. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095965261830475X
Oyebanji, A.O. 2022. Development of a framework for Sustainable Social Housing Provision (SSHP) in England. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/69947991/Development_of_a_framework_for_Sustainable_Social_Housing_Provision_SSHP_in_England.
Oyedele, L.O. and Tham, K.W. 2007. Clients’ assessment of architects’ performance in building delivery process: Evidence from Nigeria. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.030.
Qian, Q.K., Chan, E.H.W. and Khalid, Abd.G. 2015. Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7043615.
Ragab, M.A. and Arisha, A., 2018. Research methodology in business: A starter’s guide. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/buschgraart/13/
Rees, W.E., 2021. Achieving sustainability: reform or transformation?. In The Earthscan reader in sustainable cities (pp. 22-52). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315800462-3/achieving-sustainability-reform-transformation-william-rees
Robichaud, L.B. and Anantatmula, V.S. 2011. Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000030.
Sachs, J.D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N. and Rockström, J., 2019. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature sustainability, 2(9), pp.805-814. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-019-0352-9
Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M. and Smith, A., 2014. A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, pp.21-44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422414000227
Seyfang, G., Park, J.J. and Smith, A., 2013. A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy policy, 61, pp.977-989. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421513005156
Shaikh, P.H., Nor, N.B.M., Nallagownden, P., Elamvazuthi, I. and Ibrahim, T., 2014. A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, pp.409-429. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364032114001889
Sorrell, S. 2015. Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002.
Staff, R. 2011. HIGHLIGHTS-BoE policymakers before Treasury committee. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/britain-boe-mpc-idUSKING20110301.
Tabassi, A.A., Roufechaei, K.M., Ramli, M., Bakar, A.H.A., Ismail, R. and Pakir, A.H.K., 2016. Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers. Journal of cleaner production, 124, pp.339-349. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652616002535
Tan, Y., Shen, L. and Yao, H. 2011. Sustainable construction practice and contractors’ competitiveness: A preliminary study. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.008.
Thadani, H.L. and Li, G.Y. 2021. Integration of solar energy into low-cost housing for sustainable development: case study in developing countries. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08513.
Tuohy, D., Cooney, A., Dowling, M., Murphy, K. and Sixsmith, J., 2013. An overview of interpretive phenomenology as a research methodology. Nurse researcher, 20(6). https://journals.rcni.com/nurse-researcher/an-overview-of-interpretive-phenomenology-as-a-research-methodology-nr2013.07.20.6.17.e315
Uzoigwe, S.A.A., Atoofi, M., Lewis, H. and Onyedikachukwu, N., 2023. Investigating the Challenges of Engineering Project Managers in achieving Sustainability in the UK Construction Industry. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 24(9), pp.14-24. http://eprints.middle-eastlibrary.com/id/eprint/356/
Van Nguyen, M. 2023. Barriers to innovation in construction organizations of different sizes: a case study in Vietnam. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2022-0701.
Vejchodská, E., Shahab, S. and Hartmann, T. 2022. Revisiting the Purpose of Land Policy: Efficiency and Equity. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221112667.
Walker, A., 2015. Project management in construction. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tT5EBgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP8&dq=CHALLENGES+OF+ENGINEERING+PROJECT+MANAGERS+IN+ACHIEVING+SUSTAINABILITY+IN+THE+UK+CONSTRUCTION+INDUSTRY&ots=WsIMb3t6vX&sig=63YeVuPGWonm3Z3Qbv03y3kVx_w&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Walker, D.H.T. and Rowlinson, S. 2007. Procurement Systems: A cross-industry project management perspective. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301813670_Procurement_Systems_A_cross-industry_project_management_perspective.
Walter, M. and Andersen, C., 2016. Indigenous statistics: A quantitative research methodology. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315426570/indigenous-statistics-maggie-walter-chris-andersen
Wang, N. and Ma, M. 2020. Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say? Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2127.
Waris, M., Liew, M.S., Khamidi, M.F. and Idrus, A., 2014. Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3(1), pp.96-110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221260901400034X
Yuan, H. 2012. A model for evaluating the social performance of construction waste management. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.028.
Yudelson, J. and Fedrizzi, S.R. 2007. The Green Building Revolution. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43296722_The_Green_Building_Revolution.
Zangirolami-Raimundo, J., de Oliveira Echeimberg, J. and Leone, C., 2018. Research methodology topics: Cross-sectional studies. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 28(3), pp.356-360. https://www.revistas.usp.br/jhgd/article/view/152198
Zhou, N., Tigelaar, D. and Admiraal, W. 2022. Vocational teachers’ professional learning: A systematic literature review of the past decade. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103856.
Zuo, J. and Zhao, Z.Y., 2014. Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 30, pp.271-281. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S136403211300720X
