Reflective Journal/Account
As an individual reflecting on our group presentation, on the United Kingdom’s constitutional framework, I find that the collaborative effort has enriched my understanding of this complex and clear subject. Our exploration into the source and mechanisms that shape the UK constitution, along with the examination of significant legal cases. It provides a holistic view of the constitutional landscape. One clear aspect I appreciated about our group’s work was the thoroughness in covering various elements in that contribute to the UK. Constitution. The inclusion of holistic documents like the Magna Carta and the Act of Union, alongside statutes, Common law conventions and works of authority painted a vivid picture of the constitution’s evolution overtime. Most importantly, the diverse range of sources reflects the intricacies of the UK’s legal and historical heritage while I believe our group effectively conveyed this complexity to the audience.
The inclusion of intake vs Carrington (1765), As a landmark case was particularly enlightening, which has not only has violated the unwritten nature of the constitution, but also emphasise the role of common law in establishing crucial constitutional principles. Understanding how the lack of a codified constitution does not imply a lack of legal constraint on governmental powers was a key takeaway for me. Furthermore, delving into the mechanisms for state accountability, including parliamentary sovereignty the rule of law, separation of powers and the role of an independent judiciary, added depth to our presentation (AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate, 2011). The incorporation of relevant legal cases, such as Factortame (1990), And Runison vs Lord Chancellor (2017), Illustrated the practical application of these principles and showcase the dynamic nature of the constitutional framework.
On the other hand, the discussion on axis general insurance limited versus HM advocate 2011 deliver Valuable inside into the evolving nature of the UK’s constitutional arrangements. The case in my belief, demonstrated the dedicate balance between developed powers and overarching constitutional principles, highlighting the adaptability of the constitution to changing circumstances. The centrepiece of our presentation is R (Miller) versus Prime Minister (2019) has addressed one of the most significant constitutional challenges in recent history---Brexit (R (Miller) v The Prime Minister 2019). Analysing the case deepen on my appreciation for the complexity surrounding executive power parliamentary sovereignty and accountability. Brexit has profoundly reshaped UK’s constitutional fabric revealing the enduring strength of parliamentary sovereignty. The Gina Miller case advocated parliamentary sovereignty emphasise the pivotal role of parliament. I have also realised that post Brexit discussion on constitutional reforms devolution and human rights reveal the evolving nature of the UK legal landscape. It was an excellent choice that brought a contemporary dimension to our exploration of the UK constitution. On a reflective note, the collaborative process allowed for a more comprehensive examination end of the topic. Each team member brought unique insights and the discussion we had during the Preparation phase contributed to a well-rounded presentation. The experience enhanced my ability to synthesise information work collaborative and appreciate the real-world implications of constitutional principles. Apart from this, I have also observed the U K’s accountability mechanism rooted in parliamentary supremacy and the rule of law standouts. In my belief, the factor temp case highlights parliament supremacy, while Union vs Lord Chancellor advocated judicial oversight. This provided me a clear insight about the state power. Therefore, in conclusion, I would like to sum up the contribution of our group presentation on the UK. Constitution was rewarding experience that significantly expanded my understanding of this intricate subject. Most importantly, the depth of power exploration and the incorporation of relevant legal cases provided a comprehensive overview of the constitutional framework and collaborative processes.
References
• "R (Miller) v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41"
• "Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98"
• “AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 46"
