Individual reflective report
Learning isn't just about consuming some data; more like it's about transforming it into proficiency that fuels future activity. This technique of improvement is beautifully apprehended by Kolb's experiential command rebellion, where consideration of buckles is the key to open-taking transformation (Unilever PLC, 2014). Like a qualified alchemist, a consideration revolves around the plain textile of knowledge i.e. advanced awareness. We first begin with some sort of concrete understanding, inundating ourselves in the particular scheme, collaborating with the crew, and hence analysing Unilever's case study. Next, we’ll engage ourselves in the reflective proclamations, and then step back to ponder, investigate, and henceforth unpack the implication of our awareness. During this phase, we question ourselves: "What functioned well? What fell short? What underlying assumptions drove our strategy?” Our analysis of Unilever's IoT enactment, i.e. double-loop proficiency might spur us to question our assumptions about the universal usefulness of technology. Did we entirely deem probable societal or environmental significance? Did we properly delve into some sort i.e. deep adequately into the ethical deliberations of data collection and privacy? By revisiting and refining our beliefs, we reinforce the foundation upon which future activities are created. Eventually, we attain the phase of active experimentation, where we summarise our recently obtained proficiency into some better concrete actions. This could implicate proposing reasonable proposals for the company Unilever, refining fortune study inquiries, or about our knowledge to distinct contexts.
I’ve been given the responsibility to do the 3,4,5,6 number slides which I've researched according to the topic. Hence, according to my team’s decision, I've been chosen to concentrate on the favourable effects and challenges of implementing IoT for Unilever's Quality Management and Operations Performance wasn't merely a random choice. These regions further incorporate to create an essential nexus where technology's probable can enormously enrich, and disrupt, the whole value chain.
Brainstorming and Scope
Our team's trip started with a dynamic brainstorming session. We then planned some ideas which are around, attracting motivation from existing inclinations in supply chain surveillance and Unilever's distinct challenges. To guide our discussion i.e. our plan, we then utilised the Delphi Method, anonymously instructing beliefs and then purifying them through iterative voting matches. This has ensured every sort of voice i.e. was accompanied and oversaw the emergence of a well-rounded emphasis region(part): analysing the favourable consequences and challenges of implementing IoT for improving Unilever's Quality Management and hence the Operations Performance (Holstee, 2023).
Tools and Techniques
We've gone through online supplements to get more and more data for our study that we required (Bailey and Rehman, 2022). After going through varied tools/frameworks etc.. We've given some tips on how the Company can make specialities reasonable, which was referred to in the 10th slide of our presentation, assigned to my teammate in which I've furthermore assisted him in gathering some doing and doing the work completely.
Navigating Team Dynamics
Our team, not like any group, wasn't resistant to infrequent controversies. One moment of assertion originated when determining the level of granularity in our estimation. Some advocated for a broad summary, while others drove for a potent inquiry of detailed case studies (Arts, 2021). To make a solution for this, we utilized the Nominal Group Technique. This structured technique permitted each team constituent to anonymously propose recommendations, which were then frankly discussed and prioritised through voting. Ultimately, we achieved a consensus on an extent that counteracted comprehensiveness with profundity.
Moving forward, Our collaborative strategy which was benefited by insightful instruments and a willingness to adopt diverse viewpoints, laid the foundation for a victorious inquiry. The favourable effects and challenges we discerned in slides 3-8 were the outcome of this communal endeavour, the background for the next stage of our analysis i.e. problem-solving.
Specific points of disagreement and how they were resolved
Uncertainties are a portion that can take any team to the top of the sky or directly land up to the ground and likewise, we did encounter that kind of difficulty while splitting each of the parts which ought to be accomplished by individuals which at first directed to the justification to our controversy but delinquent after seating concurrently we've then decided everything and the conflict was finally unravelled (Yocco, 2018).
Our investigation into the impacts of IoT on Unilever's techniques wasn't a static activity; it was an involved pilgrimage of endless education and transformation. As we dove deeper into the study and began formulating our exhibition, our awareness of the topic which is frequently progressive, oversaw substantial modifications in our slides. I was given the responsibility for the 3, 4, 5, and 6 slides and in which I've also faced some challenges here.
Evolving Landscape
Initially, my estimation of favourable effects in slides 3 and 4 focused on well-documented usefulness like enhanced forecasting and some real-time quality supervision (UTS, 2019). Nevertheless, through conversations with enterprise specialists and outlying studies, we realized the substantial position of IoT in predictive supervision for my position. This led us to assimilate new data and case analyses showcasing how Unilever utilizes sensor data to predict equipment dissatisfactions, preventing pricey downtime and furnishing smooth procedures. This transition contemplated Argyris and Schön's single-loop knowledge, where we hence adapted our priority established on instantaneous feedback and arising data.
Challenging Assumptions
Our early draft of slide 9 highlighted path optimization and faster deliveries as fundamental modifications in functional interpretation (Limited, 2022). Nevertheless, during equivalent assessment sessions, we experienced queries about the environmental importance of improved transport. This triggered the double lasso knowledge, provoking us to re-examine our beliefs about the "positive" essence of all functional modifications. We incorporated data on sustainable logistics exercises and investigated how Unilever utilises IoT to optimise the directions for lessened emissions, demonstrating a more subtle knowledge of enactment metrics. This aligned with the precepts i.e. of Tuckman's Forming stage, where open conversation and constructive objection contour the recommendation of the undertaking.
Reframing Challenges
Slide 6 (my part) originally illustrated the challenges of implementing IoT in a purely technological light, concentrating on data protection and infrastructure expenditures. Nevertheless, feedback from team constituents with substantial social science knowledge motivated us to deem the human characteristic (Ashwani Mishra and ET CIO, 2020). We summed up data on possible job expatriation troubles and the necessity for upskilling forces to acclimate to recent technologies. This transition contemplated Tuckman's Storming phase, where some diverse viewpoints charge to some constructive dispute and a broader understanding of the problem.
Transforming the Narrative
Our presentation's development wasn't just about summing up or extracting the content; it was about reframing the description (Herbert-Smith, 2018). We moved beyond fully listing advantages and challenges to incorporate a cohesive story about the complex interplay between technology, sustainability, and some jovial responsibility. This reflected Tuckman's Norming phase, where association and peace tip to a balanced concept.
The conclusion of our investigation i.e. actions came with the exhibition. Being positioned before a captivated audience, we communicated our awareness of the double-edged blade of IoT for Unilever. As the cheering vanished, nevertheless, thinking established, encouraging us to scrutinise the accomplishments and disappointments, gleaning beneficial tasks for fortune endeavours.
Triumphant Notes
Several facets of our production reverberated intensely with the audience, flashing lively conversations and hence the positive feedback.
Data-driven narrative: Our dependence on concrete data and case studies, lent credibility and hence tangibility to our statements. This resonated with Mintzberg's 5 Ps Framework for adequate judgment-making, highlighting the significance of convincing through its evidence.
Interactive engagement: We strategically incorporated audience participation through voting and open terminated investigations (UTS, 2019). This aligns with the precepts of Edgar Schein's participatory decision-making, which scintillates deeper attention and guarantees audience buy-in.
A balanced perspective: Our declaration abstained from a simplistic "all-good" or "all-bad" portrait of IoT. Rather, we accepted both the tangible advantages and problem-solving challenges, echoing Schön's conception of thoughtful exercise and showcasing our crucial consideration capabilities.
These victories weren't just strokes of some wealth; they were conscious intentions levelled in contact and hence surveillance theses. Our data-driven procedure resounded with the audience's essential for reasonable evidence, while our interactive components ticked into the longing for considerable participation (Limited, 2022). Eventually, by smearing a balanced portrait, we ascertained academic truthfulness and crucial consideration, qualities which then were valued by any sort of audience.
Lessons from Stumbles
Yet, our exploration for superiority wasn't without its shortcomings. Peeking back, we determined regions where the exposition could have been effective.
Overlooking counter-arguments: In our willingness to showcase the possibility of IoT, we inadvertently de-emphasize distinctly unfavourable externalities like energy consumption and data privacy troubles. This supervision, determined during peer study, emphasized the significance of contemplating choice viewpoints as outlined in Janis' Groupthink thesis.
Confusing jargon: At moments, our willingness to ingrain with technical expertise oversaw the use of complicated terminology that alienated some audience constituents. This misstep aligned the Nierenberg and hence Calero's "Empathy Principle," reminding us of the necessity to hem our communication to the audience's rate of understanding.
Uneven pacing: Certain sections of the exhibition felt rushed, fleeing vital significances underdeveloped. This highlighted the significance of conserving a balanced rate as emphasized by Aristotle's Golden Mean, assuring all key junctures obtain acceptable awareness.
These deficiencies, though specified after the dust resolved, were distributed as profitable teaching moments. They underlined the importance of crucial self-reflection and constant modification. By acknowledging our blind spots and adopting varied viewpoints, we can distil our communication mastery and seek deeper effects in wealth endeavours (Herbert-Smith, 2018).
From brainstorming to exposition, our trip with Unilever and IoT resulted in a tapestry of helpful lessons, both for the undertaking and my specialist expansion.
The power of critical reflection: I understood that constant inquiry and transformation are important for refining even the vastly well-researched concepts. This, mirrored in Argyris and Schön's double-loop teaching, has imbued a deeper responsibility to constant self-evaluation and expansion.
Collaboration as a catalyst: Our team's diverse viewpoints, took on through Tuckman's phases of team expansion, questioned beliefs and widened my awareness of the problem. I now admire the immense implication of collaborative education and open conversation in shoving the constraints of its proficiency.
Communication for impact: The presentation's victories and disappointments finally taught me that something which is about tailoring the transmission to gradually reverberate with the audience. Henceforth, By adopting the Mintzberg's data-driven technique and hence incorporating with its interactive elements, I really can seek some impactful presentations that not only me/my fellow classmates notice but the also engage.
These key lessons, that were chosen accordingly i.e form a roadmap for my fortune endeavours. I will likewise carry this newfound knowledge of my gotten crucial thinking skill, collaborative education, and henceforth impactful transmission i.e. along with the understanding of henceforth navigating the complexities of certain/modern IoT enactment i.e. into every Fortune challenge.
My trip with simply just about discovering more knowledge for myself i.e. about Unilever and IoT has finally qualified me with a final toolkit of some incalculable mastery and hence schooling. I'll energetically look for new projects that will clearly implicate the data analysis and hence understanding, and henceforth about my proficiency to take out of the significant understandings from the complicated datasets. I'll then likewise volunteer to further illustrate the results to the diverse audiences, further practising the art which is of tailoring the scope and hence fascinating listeners with some distinct proficiency. I'll likewise support any empty discussion and constructive complaint, further leveraging Tuckman's phases to then stimulate a climate i.e of some shared knowledge and hence expansion.
Arts, C. of L. (2021). The Purpose of Reflection // Purdue College of Liberal Arts. [online] Purdue College of Liberal Arts. Available at: https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/icap/assessment/purpose.html.
Ashwani Mishra and ET CIO (2020). How Unilever is leveraging AI, cloud and IoT to make data-driven decisions. [online] ETCIO.com. Available at: https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/strategy-and-management/how-unilever-is-leveraging-ai-cloud-and-iot-to-take-data-driven-decisions/71299395.
Bailey, J.R. and Rehman, S. (2022). Don’t Underestimate the Power of Self-Reflection. [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2022/03/dont-underestimate-the-power-of-self-reflection.
Herbert-Smith, K. (2018). The importance of self-reflection. [online] Irisconnect.com. Available at: https://blog.irisconnect.com/uk/community/blog/importance-of-self-reflection/.
Holstee (2023). Self-Reflection 101: What is self-reflection? Why is reflection important? And how to reflect. | Reflection. app — Your guided journal for wellness and growth. [online] www.reflection.app. Available at: https://www.reflection.app/blog/self-reflection-101-what-is-self-reflection-why-is-reflection-important.
Limited, W. (2022). A new report envisions the connected IoT future of 2030 and barriers to adoption. [online] www.prnewswire.com. Available at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-report-envisions-the-connected-iot-future-of-2030-and-barriers-to-adoption-300555593.html [Accessed 23 Jan. 2024].
Porter, J. (2017). Why you should make time for self-reflection (Even if you hate doing it). [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2017/03/why-you-should-make-time-for-self-reflection-even-if-you-hate-doing-it.
Unilever PLC (2014). Unilever launches ‘Internet of Things’ partner search. [online] Unilever. Available at: https://www.unilever.com/news/press-and-media/press-releases/2014/14-07-22-unilever-launches-internet-of-things-partner-search/ [Accessed 23 Jan. 2024].
UTS (2019). The Importance of Reflective Writing. [online] University of Technology Sydney. Available at: https://www.uts.edu.au/research-and-teaching/teaching-and-research-integration/learning-journeys/students/students-resources/importance-reflective-writing.
Yocco, V. (2018). Dwelling On The Past: The Importance Of Self Reflection (Part 2) — Smashing Magazine. [online] Smashing Magazine. Available at: https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/01/importance-self-reflection-part-2/.
